Molecular targeting of renal cell carcinoma by an oral combination

Andre R Jordan1,2, Jiaojiao Wang1, Travis J Yates2,3

  • 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, 1410 Laney Walker Blvd., Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.

Oncogenesis
|May 20, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Targeting UDP-glucuronosyltransferase-1A9 (A9) with 4-methylumbelliferone (MU) improved sorafenib (SF) efficacy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) models. This combination inhibited tumor growth and metastasis with low toxicity.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has a poor 5-year survival rate (<12%) due to treatment resistance.
  • Sorafenib (SF), a modestly effective drug for mRCC, is inactivated by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase-1A9 (A9) mediated glucuronidation.
  • Elevated A9 levels in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) specimens correlate with metastasis and reduced overall survival, suggesting a mechanism for SF treatment failure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if targeting A9 can overcome SF resistance in mRCC.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of combining low-dose SF with 4-methylumbelliferone (MU), an A9 downregulator, in preclinical mRCC models.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed A9 expression in clinical RCC cohorts and TCGA dataset.
  • Utilized RCC cell lines, patient-derived tumor explants, and co-cultures to test SF and MU combination therapy.
  • Investigated the role of A9 in mediating resistance to the combination treatment.

Main Results:

  • Elevated A9 levels were observed in RCC specimens and predicted poor outcomes.
  • The combination of low-dose SF and MU effectively inhibited RCC cell growth, motility, invasion, and downregulated an invasive signature.
  • A9 overexpression conferred resistance to the SF-MU combination, while A9 downregulation sensitized cells to SF monotherapy.
  • The combination therapy demonstrated significant inhibition of kidney tumor growth, angiogenesis, and distant metastasis in preclinical models with no detectable toxicity.

Conclusions:

  • Targeting A9 with MU in combination with low-dose SF represents a promising therapeutic strategy for mRCC.
  • This approach could overcome SF resistance and improve treatment outcomes for mRCC patients with minimal toxicity.
  • Targeting specific drug-inactivating mechanisms offers a viable strategy to enhance the efficacy of existing therapies.