Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Disease-modifying treatments and cognition in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis
Nils C Landmeyer1, Paul-Christian Bürkner2, Heinz Wiendl2
1From the Clinic of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (N.C.L., H.W., T.R., S.G.M., A.J.), University Hospital Münster, Westphalian-Wilhelms-University Münster, Germany; Department of Statistics (P.-C.B., H.H.), Faculty of Psychology, Westphalian-Wilhelms-University Münster, Germany; and Department of Neurology (H.-P.H.), UKD and Center for Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, LVR Klinikum, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany. a.johnen@uni-muenster.de nils.landmeyer@ukmuenster.de.
Objective:
Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) are the gold standard for slowing disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), but their effects on cognitive impairment, a key symptom of the disease, are mostly unknown. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the differential effects of DMTs on cognitive test performance in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS).
Methods:
PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting longitudinal cognitive performance data related to all major DMTs. The standardized mean difference (Hedges g) between baseline and follow-up cognitive assessment was used as the main effect size measure.
Results:
Forty-four studies, including 55 distinct MS patient samples, were found eligible for the systematic review. Twenty-five studies were related to platform therapies (mainly β-interferon [n = 17] and glatiramer acetate [n = 4]), whereas 22 studies were related to escalation therapies (mainly natalizumab [n = 14] and fingolimod [n = 6]). Reported data were mostly confined to the cognitive domain processing speed. A meta-analysis including 41 studies and 7,131 patients revealed a small to moderate positive effect on cognitive test performance of DMTs in general (g = 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.21-0.33]), but no statistically significant differences between platform (g = 0.27, 95% CI = [0.18-0.35]) and escalation therapies (g = 0.28, 95% CI = [0.19-0.37]) or between any single DMT and β-interferon.
Conclusions:
DMTs are effective in improving cognitive test performance in RRMS, but a treatment escalation mainly to amend cognition is not supported by the current evidence. Given the multitude of DMTs and their widespread use, the available data regarding differential treatment effects on cognitive impairment are remarkably scant. Clinical drug trials that use more extensive cognitive outcome measures are urgently needed.
Related Concept Videos
Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...

