Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Large-Scale SARS-CoV-2 Testing Utilizing Saliva and Transposition Sample Pooling
Published on: June 23, 2022
Testing of Patients and Support Persons for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection Before Scheduled Deliveries
Angela Bianco1, Ayisha B Buckley, Jessica Overbey
1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.
Insights
Universal COVID-19 testing revealed over 15% of asymptomatic pregnant patients and nearly 10% of their support persons tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. A significant portion of infected patients had infected support persons, highlighting testing
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Infectious Diseases
- Public Health
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid adaptation of healthcare protocols, particularly in obstetric settings.
- Universal screening for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was implemented to mitigate transmission risks.
- The effectiveness of screening tools and the prevalence of infection in asymptomatic obstetric patients and their support persons required evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the rate of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in an obstetric population undergoing universal testing.
- To assess the concordance and discordance rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection between obstetric patients and their support persons.
- To evaluate the predictive utility of a telephone screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in this cohort.
Main Methods:
- An observational study was conducted involving scheduled deliveries within the Mount Sinai Health system.
- Pregnant patients and their designated support persons underwent telephone screening and SARS-CoV-2 testing prior to delivery.
- Data on infection rates, screening tool accuracy, and concordance among pairs were analyzed.
Main Results:
- 15.5% of asymptomatic pregnant patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2.
- 9.6% of asymptomatic support persons tested positive for SARS-CoV-2.
- Discordance in testing results between patients and support persons occurred in 7.5% of pairs; 58% of infected patients had infected support persons.
Conclusions:
- Universal SARS-CoV-2 testing identified a significant prevalence of infection in asymptomatic obstetric patients and their support persons.
- Telephone screening tools demonstrated limited utility in predicting actual infection.
- Findings underscore the importance of testing both patients and support persons to inform obstetric and newborn care practices.
Objective:
To evaluate the rate of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection with the use of universal testing in our obstetric population presenting for scheduled deliveries, as well as the concordance or discordance rate among their support persons during the initial 2-week period of testing. Additionally, we assessed the utility of a screening tool in predicting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing results in our cohort.
Methods:
This was an observational study in which all women who were scheduled for a planned delivery within the Mount Sinai Health system from April 4 to April 15, 2020, were contacted and provided with an appointment for themselves as well as their support persons to undergo COVID-19 testing 1 day before their scheduled delivery. Both the patients and the support persons were administered a standardized screen specific for COVID-19 infection by telephone interview. Those support persons who screened positive were not permitted to attend the birth. All patients and screen-negative support persons underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing.
Results:
During the study period, 155 patients and 146 support persons underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing. The prevalence of asymptomatic COVID-19 infection was 15.5% (CI 9.8-21.2%) and 9.6% (CI 4.8-14.4%) among patients and support persons, respectively. The rate of discordance among tested pairs was 7.5%. Among patients with COVID-19 infection, 58% of their support persons also had infection; in patients without infection, fewer than 3.0% of their support persons had infection.
Conclusion:
We found that more than 15% of asymptomatic maternity patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection despite having screened negative with the use of a telephone screening tool. Additionally, 58% of their asymptomatic, screen-negative support persons also tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Alternatively, testing of the support persons of women who had tested negative for COVID-19 infection had a low yield for positive results. This has important implications for obstetric and newborn care practices as well as for health care professionals.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Controls in Experiments

