Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Without Left Ventricular Venting
Published on: January 17, 2025
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease
Yu Pan1, Qi Qiu2, Wei-Hong Ren3
1Department of Cardiology, Beijing AnZhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Insights
For patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, drug-eluting stents (DES) offer similar safety and efficacy to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). DES is an acceptable alternative revascularization strategy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Optimal revascularization strategy for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is debated.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are primary treatment options.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical outcomes of DES versus CABG in patients with ULMCA disease.
- To evaluate outcomes stratified by the presence and severity of LVSD.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 984 patients with ULMCA disease.
- Patients were treated with either DES (n=511) or CABG (n=473).
- Outcomes were analyzed based on left ventricular ejection fraction levels.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke between DES and CABG groups, regardless of LVSD status.
- Target vessel revascularization was higher in the DES group for patients without LVSD.
- This difference in target vessel revascularization was not significant in patients with mild or severe LVSD.
Conclusions:
- For ULMCA disease with LVSD, DES and CABG demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety.
- DES is a viable alternative to CABG for this patient population.
Background:
The optimal coronary revascularization strategy for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent (DES) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with ULMCA disease with or without LVSD.
Methods:
A total of 984 patients with ULMCA disease who received a DES (n = 511) or underwent CABG (n = 473) were included in this study. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical parameters and outcomes of ULMCA disease patients with different left ventricular ejection fraction levels.
Results:
There were no significant differences in major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stroke between the CABG and DES groups with or without LVSD. The rate of target vessel revascularization was significantly higher with DES compared with CABG in patients without LVSD; however, the difference was not significant between the mild LVSD and severe LVSD groups.
Conclusion:
For patients with ULMCA disease and LVSD, there was no significant difference between DES and CABG in terms of efficacy and safety. Treatment with DES was an acceptable alternative to CABG.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

