Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Language and Cognition

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

High hydrostatic pressure-induced structural remodeling of walnut meal protein and its functional implications: Integrated experimental and molecular dynamics insights.

Food chemistry: X·2026

Same author

Out of sight, out of mind? How discarded items shape environmental judgments.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026

Same author

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over the Left Inferior Parietal Lobule Facilitates Early-Stage Processing During Natural Chinese-English Bilingual Reading.

Brain sciences·2026

Same author

Attentional negativity and emotional symptoms as serial mediators linking parental verbosity to non-suicidal self-injury in Chinese pre-adolescents.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Predicting adolescent depressive symptoms using teacher-reported textual descriptions of abnormal behaviors: a study based on machine learning.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026

Same author

The interactive roles between coping tendency and focus on COVID-19 information time in Adolescent Obesity.

BMC psychology·2025

Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Published on: February 15, 2015

Task demands modulate the effects of speech on text processing.

Zhu Meng¹, Zebo Lan¹, Guoli Yan¹

¹Academy of Psychology and Behavior.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition

|May 22, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Meaningful background speech disrupts reading comprehension, especially during semantic tasks. Task demands and speech content jointly influence reading distraction, supporting an Interference-by-Process model.

More Related Videos

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

Published on: October 25, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Published on: February 15, 2015

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

Published on: October 25, 2019

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Psycholinguistics
Auditory Perception

Background:

Task-irrelevant background sound can impair cognitive performance.
Attentional selectivity during reading can be disrupted by cross-modal stimuli.
The impact of background speech on reading may depend on the cognitive demands of the primary task.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how background speech affects reading performance.
To determine if the cognitive demands of a reading task modulate sensitivity to speech distraction.
To differentiate between Interference-by-Process, Interference-by-Content, and Attentional Diversion theories of distraction.

Main Methods:

Eye movements of native Chinese speakers were analyzed during reading tasks.
Participants were exposed to meaningful speech, meaningless speech, or silence.
Two reading tasks were employed: semantic acceptability and noncharacter detection.

Main Results:

No significant distraction effects were observed for the noncharacter detection task.
Meaningful background speech significantly disrupted reading during the semantic acceptability task.
Compared to silence or meaningless speech, meaningful speech increased reading time, fixations, and regressions.

Conclusions:

The disruption of reading by background speech is contingent on both the speech's meaningfulness and the cognitive process engaged by the task.
Findings support an Interference-by-Process account, suggesting distraction arises from competing cognitive processes rather than content or attentional diversion alone.