Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Strategic Screening and Characterization of the Visual GPCR-mini-G Protein Signaling Complex for Successful Crystallization
Published on: March 16, 2020
How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles?
Sangbae Lee1, Soumadwip Ghosh1, Suvamay Jana1
1Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, California 91010, United States.
Abstract:
The structural and functional properties of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are often studied in a detergent micellar environment, but many GPCRs tend to denature or aggregate in short alkyl chain detergents. In our previous work [Lee, S., et al. (2016) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15425-15433], we showed that GPCRs in alkyl glucosides were highly dynamic, resulting in the penetration of detergent molecules between transmembrane α-helices, which is the initial step in receptor denaturation. Although this was not observed for GPCRs in dodecyl maltoside (DDM, also known as lauryl maltoside), even this detergent is not mild enough to preserve the integrity of many GPCRs during purification. Lauryl maltose neopentylglycol (LMNG) detergents have been found to have significant advantages for purifying GPCRs in a native state as they impart more stability to the receptor than DDM. To gain insights into how they stabilize GPCRs, we used atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of wild type adenosine A2A receptor (WT-A2AR), thermostabilized A2AR (tA2AR), and wild type β2-adrenoceptor (β2AR) in a variety of detergents (LMNG, DMNG, OGNG, and DDM). Analysis of molecular dynamics simulations of tA2AR in LMNG, DMNG, and OGNG showed that this series of detergents exhibited behavior very similar to that of an analogous series of detergents DDM, DM, and OG in our previous study. However, there was a striking difference upon comparison of the behavior of LMNG to that of DDM. LMNG showed considerably less motion than DDM, which resulted in the enhanced density of the aliphatic chains around the hydrophobic regions of the receptor and considerably more hydrogen bond formation between the head groups. This contributed to enhanced interaction energies between both detergent molecules and between the receptor and detergent, explaining the enhanced stability of GPCRs purified in this detergent. Branched detergents occlude between transmembrane helices and reduce their flexibility. Our results provide a rational foundation to develop detergent variants for stabilizing membrane proteins.
More Related Videos
10:53Anionic Polymerization of an Amphiphilic Copolymer for Preparation of Block Copolymer Micelles Stabilized by π-π Stacking Interactions
Published on: October 10, 2016
10:27Contrast-Matching Detergent in Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Experiments for Membrane Protein Structural Analysis and Ab Initio Modeling
Published on: October 21, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Detergent Purification of Membrane Proteins
Colloids
GPCR Desensitization
Lipids as Anchors
The carboxy-terminal of most of the prenylated proteins, such as Ras proteins, contains...
GPCRs Regulate Adenylyl Cylase Activity
Cationic Chain-Growth Polymerization: Mechanism