Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025
Author Spotlight: Traditional Chinese Medicine for Sleep Disorders in Acute COPD — A Safe, Cost-Effective Approach
Published on: October 18, 2024
A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords and aluminum chloride paste
Vincent Bennani1, John M Aarts1, Paul Brunton2
1Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Objectives:
This clinical study measured the change in opening and height of the displaced gingiva using paste and cord retraction materials for definitive impression making of natural teeth and assessed if they were comparable and clinically acceptable.
Methods:
Impressions of 4 maxilla premolars from 10 participants were taken using a split-mouth protocol. All participants were free of periodontal disease, had a thick biotype, a minimal of 3 mm height of keratinized gingival tissue and gingival sulci depths of 2 mm. The bleeding index (BI), gingival index (GI) plaque index (PI), sulcular depth, level of attachment and tooth sensitivity were recorded at baseline, just after retraction, at 24 hours and at 2 weeks. Impressions were poured in stone and then after initial analysis were cross-sectioned to allow measurements of the gingival height change and gap size to be recorded.
Results:
The paste produced a slightly smaller gap compared to the cord (0.041 mm less, P = .014) whilst the mean displacement for the cord was 0.282 mm and paste was 0.241 mm respectively. Gingival height with the paste was 0.047 mm lower than that achieved by the cord (P = .208).
Conclusions:
Cord and paste retraction produced comparable clinically acceptable gingival gaps, with the cord producing statistically larger gap size.
Clinical Significance:
The cord and paste retraction materials produced comparable clinically acceptable gingival retraction.
