Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025
Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
Published on: January 17, 2025
In vitro study on the influence of postpolymerization and aging on the Martens parameters of 3D-printed occlusal
Marcel Reymus1, Bogna Stawarczyk2
1Resident, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Statement Of Problem:
Additive manufacturing has been proposed for the fabrication of occlusal devices. However, information about the mechanical properties of additively manufactured devices is lacking.
Purpose:
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of the postpolymerization unit and artificial aging on the Martens hardness (HM) and indentation modulus (EIT) of different 3D-printed materials in comparison with a conventionally milled material.
Material And Methods:
Thirty disks (20 mm in diameter and 5 mm in thickness) were additively manufactured (D20 II, Rapidshape & Form 2) for each 3D-printed material (NextDent Splint, Formlabs Dental LT Clear, and Freeprint Splint). As a control, 10 disks of the same thickness were cut from a conventionally milled material (Temp Premium). Each specimen was measured for HM and EIT (ZHU 0,2) after fabrication. The specimens were stored in water at 37 °C and measured again after 2 and 4 weeks. The data were analyzed statistically by using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon tests (adjusted by Bonferroni correction α=.05/27=.002).
Results:
The highest influence on HM parameters was shown by artificial aging (partial eta squared: HM: ηP2=0.840, EIT: ηP2=0.855, P<.001), followed by the material (HM: ηP2=0.690 EIT: ηP2=0.845, P<.001) and the postpolymerization unit (HM: ηP2=0.649, EIT: ηP2=0.778, P<.001). Initial HM values ranged from 147 ±8.11 N/mm2 for Formlabs postpolymerized in Otoflash to 89.5 ±8.55 N/mm2 for Detax postpolymerized in the Labolight unit. EIT values ranged from 3.92 ±0.061 kN/mm2 for Formlabs postpolymerized in Otoflash to 2.48 ±0.212 kN/mm2 for Detax postpolymerized in the Labolight unit. In general, HM and EIT values decreased after water storage, whereas the values remained unchanged for the control group.
Conclusions:
HM parameters of additively manufactured occlusal devices depend on postpolymerization strategy. Otoflash and Printbox result in higher HM and EIT values. The 3D-printed materials are more prone to artificial aging than the control group, which brings into question their long-term service.
