Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer: An Office Procedure
Published on: March 30, 2021
Current state of image-guided focal therapy for prostate cancer
Rafael R Tourinho-Barbosa1,2, Bradford J Wood3, Andre Luis Abreu4
1Department of Urology, Hospital CardioPulmonar, 157, Ponciano Oliveira Street, Salvador, Bahia, 40170-530, Brazil. rafael.tourinho@hotmail.com.
Purpose:
To review the current evidence regarding protocols and outcomes of image-guided focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa).
Methods:
A literature search of the latest published studies assessing primary FT for PCa was carried out in Medline and Cochrane library databases followed by a critical review. FT modalities, follow-up strategies, and oncological and toxicity outcomes were summarized and discussed in this review.
Results:
Twenty-four studies with six different sources of energy met the inclusion criteria. A heterogeneity of patient selection, energy sources, treatment templates, and definitions of failure was found among the studies. While a third of patients may be found to have additional cancer burden over 3-5 years following FT, most patients will remain free of a radical procedure. The vast majority of patients maintain urinary continence and good erectile function after FT. Acute urinary retention is the most common complication, whilst severe complications remain rare.
Conclusion:
An increasing number of prospective studies with longer follow-up have been recently published. Acceptable cancer control and low treatment toxicity after FT have been consistently reported. Follow-up imaging and routine biopsy must be encouraged post-FT. While there is no reliable PSA threshold to predict failure after FT, reporting post-FT positive biopsies and retreatment rates appear to be standard when assessing treatment efficacy.

