Minimally invasive aortic root surgery: Midterm results in a 2-year follow-up

Mahmoud Elghannam1, Yazan Aljabery1, Hamid Naraghi1

  • 1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Abstract

Insights

Minimally invasive aortic root surgery using partial upper sternotomy (PUS) is a safe alternative to full median sternotomy (FMS). This approach reduces postoperative morbidity, offering good midterm outcomes despite longer operative times.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Aortic Root Surgery

Background:

  • Partial upper sternotomy (PUS) offers a less invasive approach for aortic root surgery compared to full median sternotomy (FMS).
  • Evaluating the midterm safety and outcomes of PUS for aortic root procedures is crucial for establishing its clinical utility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the midterm safety and outcomes of minimally invasive aortic root surgery (Bentall or David procedures) performed via PUS.
  • To compare the safety profile of PUS against traditional FMS for aortic root replacement.

Main Methods:

  • A consecutive series of 47 patients underwent aortic root surgery (Bentall or David) via PUS between November 2011 and April 2017.
  • Midterm outcomes were evaluated at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-operation, focusing on safety and clinical events.

Main Results:

  • No 30-day mortality was observed. Postoperative complications included a 4.2% rethoracotomy rate and 2% superficial wound healing disturbance.
  • Hospitalization and ICU stay were 11.8 and 1.9 days, respectively. Two-year mortality and major adverse events were low (6.3% and 4.2%).

Conclusions:

  • Minimally invasive aortic root surgery via PUS is a safe alternative to FMS.
  • While operative times are longer, PUS demonstrates reduced postoperative morbidity and favorable midterm outcomes.