Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Multilevel Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease with Instability
Published on: July 25, 2025
Does zero-profile anchored cage accompanied by a higher postoperative subsidence compared with cage-plate construct?
Yingjie Lu1, Yuepeng Fang1, Xu Shen2
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215000, China.
The zero-profile anchored cage (ZP) shows a higher risk of postoperative subsidence compared to the cage-plate construct (CP) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). While ZP may reduce dysphagia, its stability and subsidence rates require further investigation.
Area of Science:
- Spine surgery
- Orthopedic biomechanics
- Neurosurgery
Background:
- Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) commonly utilizes implants to achieve spinal stability.
- The zero-profile anchored cage (ZP) is increasingly adopted for ACDF due to lower dysphagia rates.
- Controversy exists regarding the comparative stability and subsidence risk between ZP and traditional cage-plate constructs (CP).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the postoperative subsidence rates between ZP and CP implants in ACDF.
- To evaluate the influence of implant type on spinal fusion stability and patient outcomes.
- To determine if ZP devices present a higher incidence of subsidence compared to CP constructs.
Main Methods:
- A systematic meta-analysis was conducted, adhering to PRISMA guidelines.
- PubMed and Embase databases were searched to identify relevant comparative studies.
- Ten trials involving 626 patients were analyzed for clinical and radiological outcomes, including subsidence rates.
Main Results:
- The overall incidence of postoperative subsidence was significantly higher in the ZP group (15.1%) compared to the CP group (8.8%).
- Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in subsidence for single-level fusions, but a significantly higher rate for ZP in multilevel (≥2 levels) fusions.
- While ZP showed a higher subsidence rate, it was associated with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation time, and lower dysphagia incidence compared to CP.
Conclusions:
- Zero-profile anchored cages (ZP) may be associated with an increased risk of postoperative subsidence, particularly in multilevel ACDF procedures.
- Despite higher subsidence rates, ZP implants offer benefits such as reduced dysphagia and potentially shorter operation times.
- Further high-quality, multicenter randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings and guide clinical practice.
More Related Videos
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
09:07An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
Published on: May 31, 2017