Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Carcinogenic risk assessment with time-dependent exposure patterns.

D J Murdoch1, D Krewski

  • 1Health Protection Branch, Health and Welfare Canada, Ottawa, Ontario

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|December 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Critical review of the association between environmental manganese and thyroid function, with implications for potential neurodevelopmental effects.

Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews·2025
Same author

Review of non-invasive biomarkers as a tool for exposure characterization in human health risk assessments.

Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews·2024
Same author

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Australian and Indian ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Indian heart journal·2024
Same author

Magnetic resonance imaging T1 indices of the brain as biomarkers of inhaled manganese exposure.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2022
Same author

Wireless phone use in childhood and adolescence and neuroepithelial brain tumours: Results from the international MOBI-Kids study.

Environment international·2022
Same author

Derivation of whole blood biomonitoring equivalents for titanium for the interpretation of biomonitoring data.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2020

Mathematical models for cancer risk assessment often assume constant exposure. This study examines time-varying carcinogen doses using established models and derives bounds on risk underestimation from simplified averaging methods.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Mathematical Biology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Carcinogenic risk assessment traditionally uses mathematical models assuming constant exposure levels.
  • Real-world exposure to carcinogens frequently varies over time, posing challenges for accurate risk evaluation.
  • Existing models may not adequately capture risks associated with fluctuating exposure patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the impact of time-dependent dosing regimens on carcinogenic risk assessment.
  • To evaluate the accuracy of simplified dose averaging methods in time-varying exposure scenarios.
  • To derive quantitative bounds on the underestimation of risk when using time-weighted averages.

Main Methods:

  • Application of the Armitage-Doll multistage model to time-dependent exposures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing the Moolgavkar-Venzon-Knudson two-stage birth-death-mutation model for variable dosing.
  • Comparison of risk estimates derived from time-varying doses versus time-weighted averages.
  • Derivation of mathematical bounds to quantify potential risk underestimation.

    • Main Results:

    • Time-varying carcinogen exposure significantly impacts risk assessment outcomes.
    • Simple time-weighted average doses can lead to underestimation of carcinogenic risk.
    • The study provides bounds to quantify the degree of underestimation under specific models.

    Conclusions:

    • Mathematical models for carcinogenesis must account for time-dependent dosing for accurate risk assessment.
    • Time-weighted average doses are insufficient for precise risk evaluation in scenarios with fluctuating exposures.
    • The derived bounds offer a method to assess the reliability of simplified risk assessment approaches.