Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary

Jean Morrison1, Nicholas Knoblauch1, Joseph H Marcus1

  • 1Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Nature Genetics
|May 27, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Mendelian randomization (MR) methods can yield false positives due to pleiotropy. A new method, CAUSE, effectively addresses correlated pleiotropic effects, improving causal inference accuracy in genetic studies.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Mendelian randomization (MR) utilizes genetic variants to infer causal relationships between traits.
  • The increasing availability of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) expands opportunities for MR applications.
  • Existing MR methods are susceptible to false positives, particularly from horizontal pleiotropy, where genetic variants influence multiple traits through shared pathways.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel MR method, Causal Analysis Using Summary Effect estimates (CAUSE), designed to account for both correlated and uncorrelated horizontal pleiotropy.
  • To evaluate the performance of CAUSE in mitigating false positives caused by correlated horizontal pleiotropy compared to existing methods.
  • To apply CAUSE to real-world GWAS data to identify robust causal relationships.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the CAUSE method for Mendelian randomization analysis.
  • Simulation studies to assess the accuracy of CAUSE in the presence of correlated horizontal pleiotropy.
  • Application of CAUSE to summary statistics from recent genome-wide association studies.

Main Results:

  • Simulations demonstrate that CAUSE significantly reduces false positives arising from correlated horizontal pleiotropy compared to other MR approaches.
  • Application of CAUSE to GWAS data identified several causally supported relationships with strong existing literature evidence.
  • The method successfully avoided identifying numerous spurious relationships that might be suggested by alternative methods.

Conclusions:

  • Correlated horizontal pleiotropy is a common issue in genetic association studies, potentially leading to widespread false positives with standard MR techniques.
  • The CAUSE method provides a more reliable approach for causal inference in the presence of complex pleiotropic effects.
  • Shared heritable factors are prevalent and necessitate advanced methods like CAUSE for accurate causal discovery.

Related Concept Videos

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS01:11

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
15.1K
Pleiotropy01:33

Pleiotropy

Pleiotropy is the phenomenon in which a single gene impacts multiple, seemingly unrelated phenotypic traits. For example, defects in the SOX10 gene cause Waardenburg Syndrome Type 4, or WS4, which can cause defects in pigmentation, hearing impairments, and an absence of intestinal contractions necessary for elimination. This diversity of phenotypes results from the expression pattern of SOX10 in early embryonic and fetal development. SOX10 is found in neural crest cells that form melanocytes,...
43.0K
Law of Independent Assortment02:03

Law of Independent Assortment

While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.
62.0K
Multiple Allele Traits01:49

Multiple Allele Traits

The Concept of Multiple Allelism
37.7K
Epistasis Analysis01:09

Epistasis Analysis

Although Mendel chose seven unrelated traits in peas to study gene segregation, most traits involve multiple gene interactions that create a spectrum of phenotypes. When the interaction of various genes or alleles at different locations influences a phenotype, this is called epistasis. Epistasis often involves one gene masking or interfering with the expression of another (antagonistic epistasis). Epistasis often occurs when different genes are part of the same biochemical pathway. The...
5.6K
Polygenic Traits01:18

Polygenic Traits

When more than one gene is responsible for a given phenotype, the trait is considered polygenic. Human height is a polygenic trait. Studies have uncovered hundreds of loci that influence height, and there are believed to be many more. Due to the high number of genes involved, as well as environmental and nutritional factors, height varies significantly within a given population. The distribution of height forms a bell-shaped curve, with relatively few individuals in the population at the...
68.6K