Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
Published on: July 27, 2021
Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary
Jean Morrison1, Nicholas Knoblauch1, Joseph H Marcus1
1Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract:
Mendelian randomization (MR) is a valuable tool for detecting causal effects by using genetic variant associations. Opportunities to apply MR are growing rapidly with the increasing number of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, existing MR methods rely on strong assumptions that are often violated, leading to false positives. Correlated horizontal pleiotropy, which arises when variants affect both traits through a heritable shared factor, remains a particularly challenging problem. We propose a new MR method, Causal Analysis Using Summary Effect estimates (CAUSE), that accounts for correlated and uncorrelated horizontal pleiotropic effects. We demonstrate, in simulations, that CAUSE avoids more false positives induced by correlated horizontal pleiotropy than other methods. Applied to traits studied in recent GWAS studies, we find that CAUSE detects causal relationships that have strong literature support and avoids identifying most unlikely relationships. Our results suggest that shared heritable factors are common and may lead to many false positives using alternative methods.
Insights
Mendelian randomization (MR) methods can yield false positives due to pleiotropy. A new method, CAUSE, effectively addresses correlated pleiotropic effects, improving causal inference accuracy in genetic studies.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Statistical Genetics
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Mendelian randomization (MR) utilizes genetic variants to infer causal relationships between traits.
- The increasing availability of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) expands opportunities for MR applications.
- Existing MR methods are susceptible to false positives, particularly from horizontal pleiotropy, where genetic variants influence multiple traits through shared pathways.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a novel MR method, Causal Analysis Using Summary Effect estimates (CAUSE), designed to account for both correlated and uncorrelated horizontal pleiotropy.
- To evaluate the performance of CAUSE in mitigating false positives caused by correlated horizontal pleiotropy compared to existing methods.
- To apply CAUSE to real-world GWAS data to identify robust causal relationships.
Main Methods:
- Development of the CAUSE method for Mendelian randomization analysis.
- Simulation studies to assess the accuracy of CAUSE in the presence of correlated horizontal pleiotropy.
- Application of CAUSE to summary statistics from recent genome-wide association studies.
Main Results:
- Simulations demonstrate that CAUSE significantly reduces false positives arising from correlated horizontal pleiotropy compared to other MR approaches.
- Application of CAUSE to GWAS data identified several causally supported relationships with strong existing literature evidence.
- The method successfully avoided identifying numerous spurious relationships that might be suggested by alternative methods.
Conclusions:
- Correlated horizontal pleiotropy is a common issue in genetic association studies, potentially leading to widespread false positives with standard MR techniques.
- The CAUSE method provides a more reliable approach for causal inference in the presence of complex pleiotropic effects.
- Shared heritable factors are prevalent and necessitate advanced methods like CAUSE for accurate causal discovery.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Pleiotropy
Law of Independent Assortment
Multiple Allele Traits
Epistasis Analysis
Polygenic Traits

