Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Methods for Evaluating the Role of c-Fos and Dusp1 in Oncogene Dependence
Published on: January 7, 2019
Translational approach from preclinical to clinical: comparison of dose finding methods of a new Bcl2 inhibitor using
Philippe B Pierrillas1,2,3, Emilie Henin4,5, Julien Ogier6,7
1EMR 3738, Ciblage Thérapeutique en Oncologie, Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon-Sud Charles Mérieux, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69600, Oullins, France. philippe.pierrillas@gmail.com.
Abstract:
The attrition rate of anticancer drugs during the clinical development remains very high. Interspecies extrapolation of anticancer drug pharmacodynamics (PD) could help to bridge the gap between preclinical and clinical settings and to improve drug development. Indeed, when combined with a physiologically-based-pharmacokinetics (PBPK) approach, PD interspecies extrapolation could be a powerful tool for predicting drug behavior in clinical trials. The present study aimed to explore this field for anticipating the clinical efficacy of a new Bcl-2 inhibitor, S 55746, for which dose ranging studies in xenografted mice and clinical data from a phase 1 trial involving cancer patients were available. Different strategies based on empirical or more mechanistic assumptions (based on PBPK-PD modelling) were developped and compared: the Rocchetti approach (ROC); the Orthogonal Rocchetti approach (oROC), a variant of ROC based on an orthogonal regression; the Consistent across species approach, bringing out an efficacy parameter assumed to be consistent across species; and the Scaling species-specific parameters approach, assuming the concentration-efficacy link is the same in mice as in humans, after allometric scaling. Empirical approaches (ROC and oROC) gave similar predictive performances and seemed to overestimate the active S 55746 dose compared to mechanistic approaches, while strategies elaborated from semi-mechanistic concepts and PBPK-PD modelling did not seem to be invalidated by clinical efficacy data. Also, empirical methods only predict a single dose level for the subsequent clinical studies, whereas mechanism-based strategies are more informative about the dose response relationship, highlighting the potential interest of such approaches in drug development.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Preclinical Development: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Incorporating Hepatic Transporter-Mediated Clearance
A recent model describes pravastatin's hepatobiliary excretion,...
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...

