Comparison Between Parental Observations and Clinical Evaluation Findings in Korean Pediatric Patients With

Insights

Parental observations in children with intermittent exotropia align more with the condition's control level than the deviation amount. This highlights the value of parental input in assessing strabismus management.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatric Ophthalmology
  • Strabismus Research

Background:

  • Intermittent exotropia is a common form of strabismus in children.
  • Accurate assessment of intermittent exotropia is crucial for effective management.
  • Parental observations can provide valuable insights into a child's condition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare parental observations with clinical findings in pediatric intermittent exotropia.
  • To identify clinical factors influencing parental observations of the condition.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study involving parents of pediatric patients with intermittent exotropia.
  • Parental observations assessed via questionnaire (age of onset, deviated eye, awareness, frequency).
  • Comparison with clinical evaluations (ocular deviation amount, control level).

Main Results:

  • Good concordance (74%) between parental and clinical findings on the usually deviated eye.
  • Parental awareness correlated with worsening distance control (P = .04).
  • Parental frequency observations linked to poorer near (P = .037) and overall (P = .019) control.

Conclusions:

  • Parental observations are more indicative of the control level than the deviation magnitude in intermittent exotropia.
  • Parental input is valuable for assessing the functional aspects of strabismus in children.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos