Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

22.9K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dissecting genetic variance structure and evaluating genomic prediction models for single-cross hybrids derived from Stiff Stalk and Non-Stiff Stalk maize heterotic groups.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same author

PE/PPE proteins contribute to Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Epigenetic memory and systemic priming: an emerging framework for cold-resilient crops.

Plant cell reports·2026
Same author

High-Throughput Screen of NPQ in Sorghum Shows Highly Polygenic Architecture of Photoprotection.

Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Genomic selection and reproducibility: are complex models distracting us from true scientific validity in the presence of genotype-by-environment interaction?

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2025
Same author

Mean and variance heterogeneity loci impact kernel compositional traits in maize.

The plant genome·2025
Same journal

Direct link between convergent evolution at sequence level and phenotypic level of septal pore cap in Agaricomycotina.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Experimental evolution reveals bifunctional genetic solutions to loss of trpF in Salmonella enterica.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Spargel/dPGC-1 influences cell growth through the E2F1-mediated endocycle pathway.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Loss of ptr-6 restores eggshell integrity and embryonic viability in C. elegans fatty acid synthase mutants.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

A pcyt-1 Allelic Series Reveals In Vivo Consequences of Reduced Phosphatidylcholine Synthesis in C. elegans.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Copy Number Variation: A Substrate for Plant Adaptation and Stress Response in Arabidopsis.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.5K

Training Population Optimization for Genomic Selection in Miscanthus.

Marcus O Olatoye1, Lindsay V Clark1, Nicholas R Labonte1

  • 1Dept. of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)
|May 28, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Genomic selection for Miscanthus biofuel traits requires training data closely related to the target Miscanthus × giganteus (M×g) population. Using parental species Miscanthus sinensis (Msi) and Miscanthus sacchariflorus (Msa) as training sets yielded poor prediction accuracy for M×g.

Keywords:
GenPredGenomic selectionMiscanthusPopulation StructurePrediction AccuracyShared data resources

More Related Videos

Development of Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes TILLING Populations in Small Grain Crops by Ethyl Methanesulfonate Mutagenesis
08:36

Development of Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes TILLING Populations in Small Grain Crops by Ethyl Methanesulfonate Mutagenesis

Published on: July 16, 2019

12.1K
An Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Platform for Efficient Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fast Neutron-induced Medicago truncatula Mutants
09:32

An Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Platform for Efficient Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fast Neutron-induced Medicago truncatula Mutants

Published on: November 8, 2017

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.5K
Development of Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes TILLING Populations in Small Grain Crops by Ethyl Methanesulfonate Mutagenesis
08:36

Development of Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes TILLING Populations in Small Grain Crops by Ethyl Methanesulfonate Mutagenesis

Published on: July 16, 2019

12.1K
An Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Platform for Efficient Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fast Neutron-induced Medicago truncatula Mutants
09:32

An Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Platform for Efficient Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fast Neutron-induced Medicago truncatula Mutants

Published on: November 8, 2017

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Plant breeding and genetics
  • Bioenergy crop development
  • Genomic selection applications

Background:

  • Miscanthus × giganteus (M×g) is a key biofuel feedstock, but limited genetic diversity hinders breeding.
  • Genomic selection (GS) offers a path to improve biofuel traits in M×g.
  • Utilizing parental species Miscanthus sinensis (Msi) and Miscanthus sacchariflorus (Msa) germplasm for GS training is a potential strategy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of Msi and Msa diversity panels as training sets for GS in M×g.
  • To identify optimal training set composition for accurate genomic prediction of M×g breeding values.
  • To understand the impact of genetic architecture on GS prediction accuracy in interspecific populations.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed GS prediction accuracies within Msi and Msa panels, considering subpopulation structure.
  • Trained GS models using Msi and Msa subsets to predict breeding values in an M×g F2 panel.
  • Evaluated prediction accuracies in simulated M×g F2 panels with varying parental genetic contributions.

Main Results:

  • Subpopulation structure significantly impacted GS accuracies within Msi and Msa panels.
  • GS models trained on Msi and Msa showed low and negative prediction accuracies for M×g.
  • Genetic architectures with shared causal mutations across parental species resulted in the highest prediction accuracies.

Conclusions:

  • Training sets for M×g genomic selection should ideally mirror the genetic architecture of the target population.
  • Maximizing genetic relatedness between training and validation sets is crucial for accurate genomic prediction.
  • Future breeding efforts should focus on curating diverse training sets that capture causal mutations relevant to M×g.