Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Development of Sulfidogenic Sludge from Marine Sediments and Trichloroethylene Reduction in an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor
Published on: October 15, 2015
Mixed carbon source improves deep denitrification performance in up-flow anaerobic sludge bed reactor
Hong Xiao1, Jiaojiao Wu1, Hong Peng1
1College of Environmental Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, 611130 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
A mixed carbon source of sodium acetate and glucose offers a cost-effective solution for deep denitrification, maintaining optimal effluent pH and enhancing microbial diversity compared to single carbon sources.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Microbiology
- Chemical Engineering
Background:
- Deep denitrification requires an effective carbon source for optimal performance.
- Single carbon sources like sodium acetate or glucose have limitations in efficiency, pH control, and cost.
- Understanding the impact of mixed carbon sources on microbial communities is crucial for wastewater treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the advantages of using a mixed carbon source (sodium acetate/glucose) compared to single sources for deep denitrification.
- To assess denitrification performance, effluent pH, microbial community structure, and cost-effectiveness.
- To provide insights for practical selection of carbon sources in wastewater treatment.
Main Methods:
- Comparative study using sodium acetate, glucose, and a mixture as carbon sources.
- Monitoring of nitrate-nitrogen (NO3--N) removal rates and specific denitrification rates.
- Analysis of effluent pH and microbial community structure using 16S rRNA gene-based high-throughput sequencing.
- Cost estimation for different carbon sources.
Main Results:
- Mixed carbon source achieved a 96.53% NO3--N removal rate, comparable to sodium acetate (98.15%) but significantly higher than glucose (74.69%).
- The mixed carbon source reactor maintained effluent pH within the acceptable range (7.80-8.23), unlike sodium acetate alone (9.13-9.60).
- Microbial community analysis showed the highest sludge Shannon index with the mixed carbon source, indicating greater diversity.
- The mixed carbon source was the most cost-effective option.
Conclusions:
- A mixed carbon source of sodium acetate and glucose is a viable and advantageous alternative for deep denitrification.
- This approach improves effluent pH control and microbial community diversity while being economically efficient.
- The findings support the practical selection of mixed carbon sources for enhanced deep denitrification processes.
Related Concept Videos
Metabolism of Chemolithotrophs
Bioremediation
Environmental Applications of Microorganisms
Overview of Nitrogen Metabolism
The largest pool of nitrogen available in the terrestrial ecosystem is gaseous nitrogen (N2) from the air, but this...
Carbon-dioxide Fixation

