Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025
External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Sonoelastography for the comparative assessment of cervical maturation after different approaches to cervical
O G Pekarev1, E S Brega1, A I Gus1
1"National Medical Research Centre of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I. Kulakov", Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia.
Aim:
To compare the efficacy of different approaches to cervical preparation to labor induction using the ultrasound cervical elastography.
Materials And Methods:
This prospective open-label study included 200 pregnant women aged between 23 and 38 years eligible for labor pre-induction. Patients were divided into four groups (n = 50 per group). In Group I, four osmotic Dilapan-S cervical dilators combined with two doses of oral mifepristone (200 mg each) 24 h apart were used. The dilators were inserted for up to 12 h. In Group II, only the Dipalan-S dilators were used. In Group III, a Foley catheter was positioned intracervically for 12 h. In Group IV, we used two doses of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (0.5 mg each) 6 h apart. Cervical maturation was assessed using the Bishop scoring system and the ultrasound cervicometry with the color mapping and calculation of SR ratio. At baseline, all participants were also divided into three subgroups depending on the Bishop score before the pre-induction. Subgroup А (n = 66) included patients with the Bishop score between 0‒2 points, subgroup B (n = 69) between 3-4 points, and subgroup С (n = 65) between 4-6 points.
Results:
Our study showed that the efficacy of Dilapan-S combined with mifepristone for cervical preparation to labor induction was higher than Dilapan-S, Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel. In this group, the Bishop score after the pre-induction was the highest (11.4 (0.21) points versus 10.2 (0.2), 9.4 (0.3) и 9.67 (0.25) in Groups II, III and IV respectively (p < .05 for all). The lowest SR values were also observed among the patients receiving the combination of Dilapan-S and mifepristone: 1.23 (0.04) versus 1.63 (0.07), 1.7 (0.08) and 1.83 (0.1) in Groups II, III and IV respectively (p < .05 for all). The sonoelastographic SR values in subgroups B and C were statistically lower compared with subgroup A across all groups studied. Ultrasound elastography of the cervix allowed to perform a more objective assessment of cervical maturation compared with the Bishop scoring.
Conclusion:
Dilapan-S combined with mifepristone had higher efficacy for cervical preparation to labor induction compared with other approaches investigated.
More Related Videos
07:41Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: April 17, 2019
12:18Magnetic Resonance Elastography Methodology for the Evaluation of Tissue Engineered Construct Growth
Published on: February 9, 2012