Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

In vivo Calcium Imaging in Mouse Inferior Olive
Published on: June 10, 2021
Correction of out-of-FOV motion artifacts using convolutional neural network
Chengyan Wang1, Yucheng Liang2, Yuan Wu3
1Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Institute for Medical Imaging Technology (IMIT), School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Purpose:
Subject motion during MRI scan can result in severe degradation of image quality. Existing motion correction algorithms rely on the assumption that no information is missing during motions. However, this assumption does not hold when out-of-FOV motion happens. Currently available algorithms are not able to correct for image artifacts introduced by out-of-FOV motion. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating convolutional neural network (CNN) derived prior image into solving the out-of-FOV motion problem.
Methods And Materials:
A modified U-net network was proposed to correct out-of-FOV motion artifacts by incorporating motion parameters into the loss function. A motion model based data fidelity term was applied in combination with the CNN prediction to further improve the motion correction performance. We trained the CNN on 1113 MPRAGE images with simulated oscillating and sudden motion trajectories, and compared our algorithm to a gradient-based autofocusing (AF) algorithm in both 2D and 3D images. Additional experiment was performed to demonstrate the feasibility of transferring the networks to different dataset. We also evaluated the robustness of this algorithm by adding Gaussian noise to the motion parameters. The motion correction performance was evaluated using mean square error (NMSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM).
Results:
The proposed algorithm outperformed AF-based algorithm for both 2D (NMSE: 0.0066 ± 0.0009 vs 0.0141 ± 0.008, P < .01; PSNR: 29.60 ± 0.74 vs 21.71 ± 0.27, P < .01; SSIM: 0.89 ± 0.014 vs 0.73 ± 0.004, P < .01) and 3D imaging (NMSE: 0.0067 ± 0.0008 vs 0.070 ± 0.021, P < .01; PSNR: 32.40 ± 1.63 vs 22.32 ± 2.378, P < .01; SSIM: 0.89 ± 0.01 vs 0.62 ± 0.03, P < .01). Robust reconstruction was achieved with 20% data missed due to the out-of-FOV motion.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the proposed CNN-based motion correction algorithm can significantly reduce out-of-FOV motion artifacts and achieve better image quality compared to AF-based algorithm.
Related Concept Videos
Deconvolution
Deconvolution involves several mathematical techniques to derive the impulse response. One common approach is polynomial division. In this method, the input and output sequences are treated as coefficients of...
Distance Corrections
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
Convolution Properties II
The width property indicates that if the durations of input signals are T1 and T2, then the width of the output response equals the sum of both durations, irrespective of the shapes of the two functions. For instance, convolving two rectangular pulses with durations of 2 seconds and 1 second results in a function with a width of 3 seconds.
The area property asserts that the area under the...
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
Curvilinear Motion: Rectangular Components
As the car advances, its position evolves over time. Quantifying the car's velocity involves computing the...

