Minor DNA methylation changes are observed in spermatozoa prepared using different protocols
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025
Single Oocyte Bisulfite Mutagenesis
Published on: June 27, 2012
Martin Stimpfel1, Eda Vrtacnik-Bokal1
1Department of Human Reproduction, Division of Gynaecology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Background:
DNA methylation patterns can show transgenerational inheritance and are influenced by lifestyle and environmental factors. It is suggested that these patterns can be changed by assisted reproductive technology.
Objectives:
To evaluate the impact of two different sperm preparation methods, conventional density gradient centrifugation (DGC) vs. density gradient centrifugation followed by magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) of non-apoptotic spermatozoa, on sperm DNA methylation profile.
Materials And Methods:
We analyzed semen of patients included in our IVF treatment program. Half of the semen from each included patient was prepared for ICSI using the DGC method and the other half with DGC followed by MACS. The remaining samples were processed for DNA methylation analysis with reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS). In addition to the DNA methylation profile, we assessed the morphology and DNA fragmentation of spermatozoa.
Results:
RRBS analysis revealed that the average genome-wide methylation level was similar between both groups (DGC vs. MACS group) and ranged from 0.53 to 0.56. Furthermore, RRBS analysis identified 99 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and 800 differentially methylated positions (DMPs). In the DGC group, 43 DMRs and 392 DMPs were hypermethylated whereas 56 DMRs and 408 DMPs were hypomethylated compared with those in the MACS group. When DMRs and DMPs were annotated to genes, 3 genes associated with imprinting were found: IGF2, PRDM16, and CLF4/BRUNOL4. The percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa (MACS vs. DGC; 14.0 ± 10.8 vs. 13.2 ± 10.0; P = .335) and of spermatozoa with fragmented DNA of patients with RRBS analysis (22.9 ± 21.1% vs. 34.4 ± 21.2; P = .529) were also similar between groups.
Discussion And Conclusion:
Although the average genome-wide level of sperm DNA methylation was similar in both sample groups, a distinctive number of methylation changes were observed in DMR and DMP levels. A larger number of samples should be analyzed and additional sperm preparation methods should be tested to confirm our findings.
