Treatment of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction During COVID-19 Pandemic
Charan Yerasi1, Brian C Case1, Brian J Forrestal1
1Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Insights
Managing ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during COVID-19 is complex. Primary PCI is preferred over thrombolysis due to contraindications and potential for non-obstructed arteries in infected patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- The global rise in coronavirus-induced disease-2019 (COVID-19) cases presents significant challenges in managing acute cardiovascular emergencies.
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management is particularly complex during this pandemic.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and compare the risks and benefits of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus thrombolysis for STEMI in the context of COVID-19.
- To determine the optimal reperfusion strategy for STEMI patients during the pandemic.
Main Methods:
- This is a review article.
- The authors analyzed existing literature on primary PCI and thrombolysis for STEMI, focusing on patient outcomes and resource utilization.
- Specific considerations for STEMI management during active COVID-19 infection were evaluated.
Main Results:
- Thrombolysis, while an option, has numerous contraindications, potentially leading to suboptimal outcomes and increased resource use.
- Active COVID-19 infection can lead to non-obstructed coronary arteries on angiography in a significant proportion of STEMI cases.
- Primary PCI demonstrates a favorable risk-benefit profile in this setting.
Conclusions:
- Primary PCI should be the preferred reperfusion strategy for STEMI patients, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- The high likelihood of non-obstructed arteries in COVID-19 patients undergoing angiography supports the selection of primary PCI.
- Careful patient selection and resource management are crucial for STEMI treatment during public health crises.
Abstract:
The number of cases of the coronavirus-induced disease-2019 (COVID-19) continues to increase exponentially worldwide. In this crisis situation, the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is challenging. In this review, we outline the risks and benefits of primary PCI vs. thrombolysis for STEMI. While thrombolysis may seem like a good choice, many patients have a contraindication and could end up using more resources. Also, with a high probability of the angiogram showing non-obstructed coronary arteries during acute infections, primary PCI should be the preferred strategy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Myocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis III: Medical Management


