Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

2.5K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
2.5K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.8K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.8K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

280
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
280

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multisensory Number Channels Derived from Individual Differences.

Multisensory research·2025
Same author

Disrupted sensorimotor predictions in high autistic characteristics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Reply to: Failure to replicate a superiority effect in crowding.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Time is Confidence: Monetary Incentives Metacognitive Profile on Duration Judgment.

Journal of cognition·2025
Same author

Compression of time in double-step saccades.

Journal of neurophysiology·2024
Same author

Temporal adaptation of sensory attenuation for self-touch.

Experimental brain research·2023
Same journal

Turbulent flow in a vortex separator with a directed pipe inlet.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Systematic characteristic evaluation of clay-based cementitious material derived from calcium carbide residue and waste tile powder.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Retraction Note: Improvement of a rapid diagnostic application of monoclonal antibodies against avian influenza H7 subtype virus using Europium nanoparticles.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Applying large language models to spam detection in the Kazakh low-resource language setting.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

An open-source 3D printing system enabling in-situ freeze-thaw processing of hydrogels.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

An enhanced EfficientNet framework for automated waste classification using cosine annealing and label smoothing.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 20, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.3K

Temporal Context affects interval timing at the perceptual level.

Eckart Zimmermann1, Guido Marco Cicchini2

  • 1Institute for Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. Eckart.Zimmermann@uni-duesseldorf.de.

Scientific Reports
|May 31, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Previous stimulation influences perception by biasing duration judgments toward the average. This perceptual bias is modality-specific but occurs early in sensory processing, not just at decision stages.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.6K
The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 20, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.3K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.6K
The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • Observers integrate recent stimulation history with current sensory evidence.
  • The timing of this integration (perceptual vs. decision stage) remains unclear.
  • Duration judgments often show central tendency effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if temporal biases occur at the perceptual or decision stage.
  • To investigate the modality specificity and generalization of temporal biases.

Main Methods:

  • Duration comparison tasks involving intervals with varying uncertainty.
  • Utilizing central tendency effects in duration judgments.
  • Comparing cross-modal and within-modal transfer of biases.

Main Results:

  • Perceived duration regressed toward the average, indicating a perceptual bias.
  • Bias was modality-specific (visual vs. auditory).
  • Bias generalized across passive observation and active production.

Conclusions:

  • Temporal central tendency effects influence perceived duration at a perceptual level.
  • Sensory evidence integration can occur within sensory systems.
  • Biases are modality-specific but generalize across response types.