Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Complete Revascularization by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial
Yousif Ahmad1,2, James P Howard2, Ahran Arnold2
1Columbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Insights
Complete revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduces cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease. This approach improves hard clinical outcomes compared to culprit-only revascularization.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
Background:
- Optimal treatment for non-infarct-related arteries in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel coronary artery disease remains debated.
- Complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization is a critical consideration for these high-risk patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the benefits of complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus culprit-only revascularization in STEMI patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
- To analyze individual clinical endpoints, including cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction.
Main Methods:
- Systematic identification of randomized trials comparing complete revascularization (PCI) to culprit-only revascularization in STEMI patients with multivessel disease.
- Random-effects meta-analysis of 10 studies including 7542 patients.
- Primary efficacy endpoint: cardiovascular death (intention-to-treat); Secondary endpoints: all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization.
Main Results:
- Complete revascularization significantly reduced cardiovascular death (RR, 0.68; P=0.037) and myocardial infarction (RR, 0.65; P<0.0001).
- Unplanned revascularization was also significantly reduced with complete revascularization (RR, 0.37; P<0.0001).
- No statistically significant difference was observed in all-cause mortality (RR, 0.85; P=0.108).
Conclusions:
- Complete revascularization with PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease significantly improves hard clinical outcomes, including cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction.
- These findings support the consideration of complete revascularization in clinical practice guidelines for STEMI management.
Abstract:
Background For patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease, the optimal treatment of the non-infarct-related artery has been controversial. This up-to-date meta-analysis focusing on individual clinical end points was performed to further evaluate the benefit of complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease. Methods and Results We systematically identified all randomized trials comparing complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention to culprit-only revascularization for multivessel disease in STEMI and performed a random-effects meta-analysis. The primary efficacy end point was cardiovascular death analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary end points included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization. Ten studies (7542 patients) were included: 3664 patients were randomized to complete revascularization and 3878 to culprit-only revascularization. Across all patients, complete revascularization was superior to culprit-only revascularization for reduction in the risk of cardiovascular death (relative risk [RR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.98; P=0.037; I2=21.8%) and reduction in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79; P<0.0001; I2=0.0%). Complete revascularization also significantly reduced the risk of unplanned revascularization (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.28-0.51; P<0.0001; I2=64.7%). The difference in all-cause mortality with percutaneous coronary intervention was not statistically significant (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.69-1.04; P=0.108; I2=0.0%). Conclusions For patients with STEMI and multivessel disease, complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention significantly improves hard clinical outcomes including cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction. These data have implications for clinical practice guidelines regarding recommendations for complete revascularization following STEMI.
More Related Videos
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina IV: Management