Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Implantation of Total Artificial Heart in Congenital Heart Disease
Published on: July 18, 2014
Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Complex Congenital Heart Disease: A Case Series
Collin C Kramer1, Jennifer R Maldonado2, Mark D Olson2
1University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Insights
Atrial antitachycardia pacing (ATP) effectively treats tachycardia in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients. However, success rates vary by individual anatomy and compliance, with challenges in complex cases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Congenital Heart Disease
Background:
- Intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is a frequent complication in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients, increasing morbidity and mortality.
- Atrial antitachycardia pacing (ATP) via atrial antitachycardia devices (ATDs) is a treatment for IART, but data on its efficacy in CHD is limited.
- Comparisons of ATP effects across different CHD subtypes are lacking.
Observation:
- This study reviewed three complex CHD patients with ATDs: systemic left ventricle, systemic right ventricle, and single ventricle.
- Data included ATP success rates, medications, DC cardioversions, and ATD-related complications.
- ATP success rates were 73% (systemic left ventricle), 96% (systemic right ventricle), and 97% (single ventricle).
Findings:
- Patients with biventricular physiology (systemic left and right ventricles) reduced or eliminated the need for DC cardioversions post-ATD implantation.
- The single-ventricle patient required DC cardioversions due to noncompliance and IART episodes with 1:1 conduction or low rates.
- ATP efficacy in CHD varies based on arrhythmia substrate, cardiac anatomy, and patient compliance.
Implications:
- ATP is a viable treatment option for IART across diverse CHD anatomies.
- Individualized patient management and monitoring are crucial for optimizing ATP outcomes in CHD.
- Further research is needed to address IART detection challenges in highly complex CHD cases.
Abstract:
Among the congenital heart disease (CHD) population, intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is a common sequela resulting from anatomical anomalies and surgical scars that significantly increases morbidity and mortality. Atrial antitachycardia pacing (ATP) delivered by atrial antitachycardia devices (ATDs) has been used to treat IART in the CHD population. However, there remains limited data on the safety and efficacy of ATP, as well as on comparisons of its effects amongst different CHD subtypes. The purpose of the current study is to describe the clinical history and ATP efficacy in three patients with unique forms of complex CHD. During this study, a single-center review of three patients with ATDs was performed. One patient with each of the following CHD anomalies was selected for inclusion: systemic left ventricle, systemic right ventricle, and single ventricle. Data collected included ATP success rates, medications in use, direct current (DC) cardioversions, and any complications related to the ATDs. Study findings revealed the patient with a systemic left ventricle had an ATD implanted for approximately 9.5 years, with 695 of 956 (73%) episodes successfully converted. Unsuccessfully treated episodes were generally asymptomatic and self-terminating in this patient. The patient with a systemic right ventricle had an ATD implanted for approximately 16 years, with 333 of 348 (96%) episodes being successfully converted. The patient with a single ventricle had an ATD implanted for approximately 12.5 years, with 404 of 416 (97%) episodes successfully converted. The patients with biventricular physiology were able to forgo DC cardioversion after receiving their ATDs. However, due to medical noncompliance as well as multiple episodes of IART, which presented with 1:1 conduction or low rates, the single-ventricle patient still required DC cardioversions post-ATD implantation. In conclusion, this study's findings demonstrate that, while ATP can be effective in a wide variety of CHDs, experiences can vary based on individual arrhythmia substrates, cardiac anatomy, and medical compliance. Additionally, challenges remain in IART detection in patients with especially complex CHD anatomies.
More Related Videos
06:57Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Using a Multipolar Catheter and 3-dimensional Mapping System for High-density Electro-anatomical Reconstruction
Published on: January 31, 2019
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias II: Classification of Tachyarrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy