Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
Published on: October 27, 2016
Analytically Embedding Differential Equation Constraints into Least Squares Support Vector Machines Using the Theory
Carl Leake1, Hunter Johnston1, Lidia Smith2
1Department of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
The Theory of Functional Connections (TFC) offers a more accurate and efficient method for solving differential equations (DEs) compared to least-squares support vector machines (LS-SVM). TFC transforms DEs into unconstrained problems, outperforming LS-SVM and a combined CSVM approach in numerical tests.
Area of Science:
- Numerical analysis
- Computational mathematics
- Applied mathematics
Background:
- Differential equations (DEs) are fundamental numerical models in science and engineering.
- Existing methods for solving DEs include least-squares support vector machines (LS-SVM).
- The Theory of Functional Connections (TFC) offers a novel approach using constrained expressions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of the Theory of Functional Connections (TFC) against least-squares support vector machines (LS-SVM) for solving differential equations.
- To introduce and evaluate a hybrid method, constrained SVMs (CSVM), combining TFC and LS-SVM.
- To assess both speed and accuracy of TFC, LS-SVM, and CSVM across various differential equation types.
Main Methods:
- The TFC method reformulates DEs as unconstrained optimization problems solved via least-squares.
- LS-SVM is used as a benchmark for comparison.
- A novel CSVM methodology integrates LS-SVM within the TFC framework.
- Numerical tests were performed on four distinct ODE and PDE problems.
Main Results:
- TFC demonstrated superior accuracy, achieving multiple orders of magnitude lower maximum and mean squared errors.
- TFC was generally faster than LS-SVM and CSVM, with training times an order of magnitude less.
- The CSVM approach showed comparable performance to LS-SVM, indicating TFC's core advantage.
Conclusions:
- TFC provides a more accurate and efficient solution strategy for differential equations compared to LS-SVM and CSVM.
- The TFC method's ability to handle constraints within its framework is key to its improved performance.
- This study highlights TFC as a promising alternative for numerical modeling in engineering and scientific applications.
Related Concept Videos
Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain
In contrast, nonlinear systems do not inherently possess these properties. However, for small deviations around an operating point, a nonlinear system can often be approximated as linear....
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
Linear Approximation in Time Domain
For a simple pendulum with a mass evenly distributed along its length and the center of mass located at half the pendulum's length,...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Transmission-Line Differential Equations
Line Section Model
A circuit representing a line section of length Δx helps in understanding the transmission line parameters. The voltage V(x) and current i(x) are measured from...
Differential Form of Maxwell's Equations

