Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Clinicians Report Barriers and Facilitators to High-Quality Ambulatory Oncology Care
Megan Lafferty1, Milisa Manojlovich, Jennifer J Griggs
1Author Affiliations: University of Michigan School of Nursing (Drs. Lafferty, Manojlovich, and Friese and Mr. Wright); Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium (Dr Griggs); Ann Arbor Veterans Administration Health System, Center for Clinical Management Research (Dr Harrod); and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Internal Medicine, University of Michigan (Dr Griggs), Ann Arbor.
Background:
Ambulatory oncology practices treat thousands of Americans on a daily basis with high-risk and high-cost antineoplastic agents. However, we know relatively little about these diverse practices and the organizational structures influencing care delivery.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to examine clinician-reported factors within ambulatory oncology practices that affect care delivery processes and outcomes for patients and clinicians.
Methods:
Survey data were collected in 2017 from 298 clinicians (nurses, physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) across 29 ambulatory practices in Michigan. Clinicians provided written comments about favorable and unfavorable aspects of their work environments that affected their ability to deliver high-quality care. We conducted inductive content analysis and used the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety work system model to organize and explain our findings.
Results:
Clinicians reported factors within all 5 work-system components of the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model that affected care delivery and outcomes. Common themes surfaced, such as unfavorable aspects including staffing inadequacy and high patient volume, limited physical space, electronic health record usability issues, and order entry. Frequent favorable aspects focused on the skills of colleagues, collaboration, and teamwork. Some clinicians explicitly reported how work system factors were relational and influenced patient, clinician, and organizational outcomes.
Conclusions:
These findings show how work-system components are interactive and relational reflecting the complex nature of care delivery.
Implications For Nursing Practice:
Data obtained from frontline clinicians can support leaders in making organizational changes that are congruent with clinician observations of practices' strengths and opportunities for improvement.
Related Concept Videos
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Types of Reports I: Hands-off Report
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:
