Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025
Diagnosis of Hirschsprung's Disease by Immunostaining Rectal Suction Biopsies for Calretinin, S100 Protein and Protein Gene Product 9.5
Published on: April 26, 2019
Growth outcomes in Hirschsprung disease patients following pull-through
Gunadi1, T Juwitasari2, N N R Damayanti2
1Universitas Gadjah Mada, Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Pediatric Surgery Division, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. drgunadi@ugm.ac.id.
Introduction:
Despite various definitive methods that are used for treating Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR), there are few studies comparing the effect of different pull-through methods on the growth outcomes of patients. We aimed to compare the effect of three different pull-through methods, namely Duhamel, Soave and transanal endorectal pullthrough (TEPT), on HSCR growth outcomes of patients.
Methods:
Medical records of all HSCR patients who underwent pull-through at the Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Indonesia between January 2010 and August 2016 were reviewed for their growth outcomes before and after the surgery.
Results:
We included 64 HSCR patients, 45 males and 19 females, of which 14, 17, and 33 patients underwent Duhamel, Soave, and TEPT respectively. There were no nutritional status differences in HSCR patients after Duhamel, Soave, and TEPT surgery (p=0.07, 0.17, and 0.79, respectively). Z-score average of weight-for-age did not differ between three surgical methods (p=0.77 and 0.15 for preoperative and postoperative, respectively). In addition, the improvement of nutritional status was achieved in 21.2% HSCR patients after TEPT, 14.3% post Duhamel and 5.9% following Soave procedure, but these differences did not reach a significant level (p=0.34).
Discussion:
Our study shows no difference in effect on the growth outcomes in HSCR patients following Duhamel, Soave and TEPT procedure. Further study with a larger sample size is important to give valuable long-term growth outcomes for HSCR patients after pull-through.
