The Global Burn Registry: A Work in Progress

In 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Global Burn Registry (GBR). Its purpose is to help improve the understanding of burn injury worldwide. The purpose of this study was to identify early findings from this database. The GBR was accessed on January 5, 2020. Cases from centers in low income (LIC) and low-middle-income countries (LMIC) were combined into a low resource (LR) group, and cases in high income (HIC) and upper-middle-income countries (UMIC) were combined into a high resource (HR) group. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS 9.4. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for death. Revised Baux Score (RBS) was calculated. Odds ratios are expressed as mean (95% confidence interval). The LA50 was calculated from the regression of death and total burn size (TBSA) for different age groups. At the time of analysis, there were 4307 cases in the GBR treated at 28 facilities in 17 countries (5 HIC, 5 UMIC, 4 LMIC, and 3 LIC). There were 2945 cases (68%) from HR countries and 1362 (32%) from LR countries. The mean age of patients in both LR and HR was similar (24.5 ± 0.5 vs 24.2 ± 0.4 years, P = .58), but LR had larger TBSA burns (30.5 ± 0.7% vs 19.8 ± 0.4% TBSA, P < .0001). There were fewer scald burns and more flame injuries in the LR countries (28.4 ± 1.3% vs 43.3 ± 1.0% and 55.2 ± 1.4% vs 39.0 ± 0.9%, P < .0001). Case fatality and RBS were greater in LR (31.9 ± 1.3% vs 9.4 ± 0.5% and 59.4 ± 1.1% vs 45.3 ± 0.6%, P < .0001). In regression analysis, LR was an independent risk factor for death with an odds ratio of 4.2 (3.2-5.4). The LA50 for HR countries was similar to that calculated from cases in the National Burn Repository of the American Burn Association (ABA NBR). For LR countries, the LA50 was lower for all ages except those 65 and older, ranging from 30% to 43% TBSA. Only a few facilities have contributed data to the GBR so far, with LR countries less represented than HR ones. The proportion of cases in the pediatric age group is much less represented in LR countries than in HR, possibly because many burned children in LR countries do not get burn care at specialized centers. Survival in HR countries is similar to that in North America. The GBR provides early insights into global burn care. Opportunities for improvement are greatest in LR countries. New Innovations may be necessary to increase participation from burn centers in LR countries. This report provides an early look at burn care across the globe based on cases in the GBR. It may inform further efforts to characterize and improve burn care in LR countries.