Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

687
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
687
Cerebral Hemispheres01:05

Cerebral Hemispheres

1.8K
The human brain, a complex organ, is functionally divided into two cerebral hemispheres—left and right. These hemispheres are interconnected by a structure of paramount importance, the corpus callosum. This substantial bundle of neural fibers is not just a bridge between the hemispheres but a crucial element for the brain's comprehensive functioning. It enables efficient communication between the two hemispheres, allowing each side of the brain to control and receive sensory and motor...
1.8K
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

863
Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
863

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating the reliability of functional near-infrared spectroscopy data in the context of a reasoning paradigm.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Individual Differences in Error-Related Brain Activity and Post-Error Slowing in Children.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same author

Task context is broadly encoded in the human brain.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Multimodal personalised executive function intervention (E-Fit) for school-aged children with complex congenital heart disease in Switzerland: a randomised controlled feasibility study.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Advancing high-resolution 7 T diffusion MRI: Evaluating phase-encoding correction strategies for distortion correction from basic to four-way acquisitions.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same author

Academic success and mental health: The paradox of Frontoparietal-Default Mode Network coupling among children facing poverty.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

7.8K

Insights into visual working memory precision at the feature- and object-level from a hemispheric encoding

Elena M Galeano Weber1, Haley Keglovits2, Arin Fisher2

  • 1Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|June 3, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Visual working memory (WM) stores object features separately at encoding. However, during maintenance, features can interfere, especially under central encoding, with size precision more robust in the right hemisphere.

Keywords:
Visual working memoryencodingfeature bindinghemisphereinterferenceprecision

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K
Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography
09:25

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography

Published on: July 26, 2019

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

7.8K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K
Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography
09:25

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography

Published on: July 26, 2019

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Mnemonic precision is crucial for visual working memory (WM).
  • Understanding how spatial (size) and non-spatial (color) features are processed in WM is key.
  • Investigating feature-level and object-level representations provides insight into WM mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To probe mechanisms affecting precision for spatial and non-spatial features in WM.
  • To determine if features are encoded and stored separately or together.
  • To examine how hemispheric encoding influences object representation in WM.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed mnemonic precision for size and color features of objects.
  • Manipulated central and lateralized (left/right hemisphere) encoding.
  • Tested feature-level (within-object) and object-level (across-object) interactions.
  • Analyzed recall fidelity and feature interference patterns.

Main Results:

  • No significant coupling between feature recall fidelity at the feature-level, supporting parallel encoding channels.
  • Asymmetric feature interference observed under central encoding (color load impacted size precision).
  • Largely independent feature stores when objects were encoded by a single hemisphere.
  • Right-hemisphere encoding showed greater resistance of size precision to interference.

Conclusions:

  • Distinct features of an object are represented separately during WM encoding.
  • Partial integration and interference occur during the maintenance of sequentially presented objects in WM.
  • Hemispheric specialization influences the independence and interference patterns of feature representations in WM.