Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
Published on: August 30, 2016
Verification of reliability and validity of motion analysis systems during bilateral squat using human pose tracking
Megumi Ota1, Hiroshige Tateuchi1, Takaya Hashiguchi2
1Department of Preventive Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
OpenPose motion analysis demonstrates high reliability and validity for trunk, knee, and ankle joints, though hip joint analysis shows fair results. This low-cost method offers potential for clinical use after addressing identified biases.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Human Motion Analysis
- Computer Vision
Background:
- OpenPose is a human tracking algorithm capable of detecting joint points and calculating joint angles.
- The reliability and validity of OpenPose for motion analysis remain underexplored.
- Clarifying OpenPose's accuracy is crucial for its adoption in research and clinical settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability and validity of OpenPose for human motion analysis.
- To compare joint angle measurements from OpenPose against a gold-standard 3D motion capture system (VICON).
Main Methods:
- Twenty healthy subjects performed bilateral squats.
- Joint angles (trunk, hip, knee, ankle) were measured using both OpenPose and VICON.
- Test-retest reliability was assessed using ICC (1, 3).
- Validity was evaluated through linear regression and ICC (2, 1) against VICON data.
- Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess agreement and identify biases.
Main Results:
- OpenPose demonstrated almost perfect test-retest reliability (ICC (1, 3)).
- High agreement (ICC (2, 1)) was found for trunk, knee, and ankle joints (almost perfect/substantial).
- Hip joint analysis showed fair agreement (ICC (2, 1)).
- Fixed biases were observed for knee and ankle joints; proportional biases for trunk and hip joints.
Conclusions:
- OpenPose-based motion analysis is reliable and offers a cost-effective, user-friendly alternative to traditional methods.
- Further research is needed to address identified biases for enhanced clinical utility.
- Correction strategies for fixed and proportional biases will improve the accuracy of OpenPose in clinical applications.
More Related Videos
09:37Substantiating Appropriate Motion Capture Techniques for the Assessment of Nordic Walking Gait and Posture in Older Adults
Published on: May 12, 2016
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024