Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Comprehensive review of ICD-9 code accuracies to measure multimorbidity in administrative data
Melissa Y Wei1,2, Jamie E Luster3, Chiao-Li Chan4
1Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Bldg 16, Rm 430W, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. weimy@med.umich.edu.
Insights
This study reviewed the accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes for 81 chronic conditions. Most codes showed good accuracy, supporting their use in healthcare research for multimorbidity.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare research
- Medical informatics
- Public health
Background:
- Quantifying multimorbidity burden in healthcare research using administrative data is challenging.
- Existing measures inadequately capture chronic conditions and focus narrowly on risk adjustment.
- Accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes for representing chronic conditions needs rigorous review.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a comprehensive literature review on the accuracy of ICD-9 codes for 81 chronic conditions.
- To assess the validity of ICD-9 codes using external data sources.
- To provide data to facilitate patient-centered multimorbidity measures in administrative data.
Main Methods:
- Performed structured literature searches in PubMed and Google Scholar for studies validating ICD-9 codes.
- Identified studies validating ICD-9 codes against external data sources for 81 chronic conditions.
- Extracted accuracy measures including positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics.
Main Results:
- Validation statistics for ICD-9 codes were found for 51 (64%) of the 81 conditions.
- Medical chart review was the most common external reference standard (92% of studies).
- Median PPV was 85% and median NPV was 91% for conditions validated by chart review, with most conditions having PPV ≥70%.
Conclusions:
- This review provides accuracy data for ICD-9 codes representing chronic conditions impacting health-related quality of life.
- Findings support the use of ICD-9 codes in administrative data for patient-centered multimorbidity measures.
- Assists health services studies in measuring chronic disease burden and risk adjustment using patient-centered outcomes.
Background:
Quantifying the burden of multimorbidity for healthcare research using administrative data has been constrained. Existing measures incompletely capture chronic conditions of relevance and are narrowly focused on risk-adjustment for mortality, healthcare cost or utilization. Moreover, the measures have not undergone a rigorous review for how accurately the components, specifically the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, represent the chronic conditions that comprise the measures. We performed a comprehensive, structured literature review of research studies on the accuracy of ICD-9 codes validated using external sources across an inventory of 81 chronic conditions. The conditions as a weighted measure set have previously been demonstrated to impact not only mortality but also physical and mental health-related quality of life.
Methods:
For each of 81 conditions we performed a structured literature search with the goal to identify 1) studies that externally validate ICD-9 codes mapped to each chronic condition against an external source of data, and 2) the accuracy of ICD-9 codes reported in the identified validation studies. The primary measure of accuracy was the positive predictive value (PPV). We also reported negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics when available. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for studies published before June 2019.
Results:
We identified studies with validation statistics of ICD-9 codes for 51 (64%) of 81 conditions. Most of the studies (47/51 or 92%) used medical chart review as the external reference standard. Of the validated using medical chart review, the median (range) of mean PPVs was 85% (39-100%) and NPVs was 91% (41-100%). Most conditions had at least one validation study reporting PPV ≥70%.
Conclusions:
To help facilitate the use of patient-centered measures of multimorbidity in administrative data, this review provides the accuracy of ICD-9 codes for chronic conditions that impact a universally valued patient-centered outcome: health-related quality of life. These findings will assist health services studies that measure chronic disease burden and risk-adjust for comorbidity and multimorbidity using patient-centered outcomes in administrative data.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

