Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Computed Tomography01:10

Computed Tomography

7.8K
Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
7.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Symptom-Only Localization of Brainstem Ischemia Using Large Language Models Versus Neurologists in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-Positive Cases: Retrospective Single-Center Study.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same author

Radiologists' memory as a data protection risk: a worst-case stress test for chest radiograph re-identification.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same author

Towards an accessible, centralised, searchable database for AI courses in Europe: the Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology Education (AIMIROE) project.

European radiology experimental·2026
Same author

Challenges underlying radiology's research problem.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same author

BCLC classification and AI-based image quantification: What is meant to be will come together - but how and when?

Journal of hepatology·2026
Same author

Photon-counting detector CT with iodine quantification: improved distinction between bland and neoplastic portal vein thrombosis.

European radiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences
08:19

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences

Published on: May 17, 2018

10.2K

Quantification of metal artifacts in computed tomography: methodological considerations.

Nils Große Hokamp1,2,3, Brendan Eck2, Florian Siedek1

  • 1Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
|June 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study compared computed tomography (CT) artifact quantification methods. Automated analysis, particularly using Fourier transforms, showed better reproducibility than manual measurements for assessing CT image artifacts.

Keywords:
Computed tomography (CT)artifactimage reconstructionquantitative image analysis

More Related Videos

Three-Dimensional Particle Shape Analysis Using X-ray Computed Tomography: Experimental Procedure and Analysis Algorithms for Metal Powders
10:10

Three-Dimensional Particle Shape Analysis Using X-ray Computed Tomography: Experimental Procedure and Analysis Algorithms for Metal Powders

Published on: December 4, 2020

2.1K
DUCT: Double Resin Casting followed by Micro-Computed Tomography for 3D Liver Analysis
12:39

DUCT: Double Resin Casting followed by Micro-Computed Tomography for 3D Liver Analysis

Published on: September 28, 2021

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences
08:19

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences

Published on: May 17, 2018

10.2K
Three-Dimensional Particle Shape Analysis Using X-ray Computed Tomography: Experimental Procedure and Analysis Algorithms for Metal Powders
10:10

Three-Dimensional Particle Shape Analysis Using X-ray Computed Tomography: Experimental Procedure and Analysis Algorithms for Metal Powders

Published on: December 4, 2020

2.1K
DUCT: Double Resin Casting followed by Micro-Computed Tomography for 3D Liver Analysis
12:39

DUCT: Double Resin Casting followed by Micro-Computed Tomography for 3D Liver Analysis

Published on: September 28, 2021

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Image Analysis

Background:

  • Computed tomography (CT) imaging is prone to artifacts that can affect image quality.
  • Numerous methods for quantifying these artifacts exist, but their clinical utility and reproducibility are not well-established.
  • Evaluating artifact quantification methods against human perception is crucial for clinical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of various artifact quantification methods in CT imaging.
  • To assess the correspondence of quantitative methods with radiologists' visual perception of artifacts.
  • To determine the reproducibility of different artifact quantification techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Two titanium rods were scanned using 25 different CT parameters to induce varying artifacts.
  • Four radiologists visually ranked artifact severity using specialized software, with repeated assessments.
  • Quantitative methods included manual measurements (attenuation, noise) and automated algorithms (image- and frequency-domain).
  • Statistical analysis involved Kappa-statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

Main Results:

  • Radiologists demonstrated excellent intra- and inter-reader agreement (ICC 0.85-0.92) in visual artifact perception.
  • No single quantitative method perfectly replicated the visual ranking of artifacts.
  • Manual measurements showed low to moderate ICC (0.25-0.97), indicating limited reproducibility.
  • An automated method using Fourier-transformed linear ROI and lower-end frequency bins exhibited the best correspondence and reproducibility.

Conclusions:

  • Automated artifact quantification methods are preferable to manual measurements due to superior reproducibility in CT imaging.
  • A Fourier-transform-based approach shows promise for reliable automated artifact quantification.
  • Further development and validation of automated methods are recommended for clinical use.