Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.7K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.7K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

187
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
187
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

9.5K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
9.5K
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

4.9K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
4.9K
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data01:12

Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

601
Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data involves studying the behavior of drugs within diverse populations to understand their pharmacokinetic parameters. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods typically involve collecting samples from a few individuals and estimating these parameters. While these methods are commonly used, they have limitations in capturing the variability in drug response among individuals or heterogeneous populations. Population pharmacokinetics is employed to address these...
601
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.2K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Real-Time Associations Between Subjective Cognitive Concerns and Daily Activity Participation in Persons Aging With Stroke: Smartphone-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

JMIR aging·2026
Same author

Effects of a mobile-based self-management program on mental health in young adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Disparities in Initial Usage of Direct-to-Patient Teledermatology: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association·2026
Same author

Leadership Behaviors and Burnout in Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study in the Veterans Health Administration.

Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives·2026
Same author

Digital Mental Health Treatments for Depression.

The Psychiatric clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Popular Online Content as a Treatment-as-Usual Control in Digital Mental Health Intervention Trials: Secondary Analysis of Two Online Randomized Controlled Trials With Repeated Measures.

JMIR mental health·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.2K

Machine Learning for Phone-Based Relationship Estimation: The Need to Consider Population Heterogeneity.

Tony Liu1, Jennifer Nicholas2, Max M Theilig2

  • 1University of Pennsylvania, USA.

Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
|June 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Predicting social relationships using phone data is improved by combining communication logs with demographics and location. Models trained on young people do not generalize well to diverse populations, highlighting the need for varied data in digital mental well-being studies.

Keywords:
automated machine learningpopulation heterogeneitysemantic location-based featuressocial relationship prediction

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.8K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.2K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.8K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Digital phenotyping
  • Computational social science
  • Mental well-being research

Background:

  • Assessing interpersonal relationships via phone sensor data is crucial for understanding social support and mental well-being.
  • Previous studies primarily used communication volume, often with limited sample sizes, to categorize relationships.
  • A need exists for more robust methods that account for diverse populations and contextual data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To enhance the prediction of interpersonal relationship categories using contextualized phone sensor data.
  • To evaluate the impact of demographic and location data alongside communication patterns.
  • To investigate the generalizability of models trained on specific age groups to broader populations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized automated machine learning on a varied sample population.
  • Combined phone communication logs with demographic and location data.
  • Compared model performance using communication features alone versus contextualized data.

Main Results:

  • Contextualizing communication data with demographics and location improved relationship prediction performance (F1 = 0.68) compared to communication features alone (F1 = 0.62).
  • Machine learning models trained on younger demographic subgroups demonstrated poor generalization to the wider population.
  • Age variation within the training sample significantly impacts the predictive accuracy for interpersonal relationship roles.

Conclusions:

  • Integrating diverse data sources (demographics, communication, location) significantly boosts the accuracy of predicting interpersonal relationships from phone data.
  • Reliance on data from younger populations in digital mental well-being studies can lead to biased and poorly generalizable models.
  • Future research must prioritize population heterogeneity and diverse data in phone-based personal sensing studies to ensure equitable and accurate insights.