Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

In Vitro Bioluminescence Assay to Characterize Circadian Rhythm in Mammary Epithelial Cells
Published on: September 28, 2017
Oncogenic and Circadian Effects of Small Molecules Directly and Indirectly Targeting the Core Circadian Clock
Hui-Hsien Lin1, Kelly L Robertson1, Heather A Bisbee1
1University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
Abstract:
Circadian rhythms are essential for controlling the cell cycle, cellular proliferation, and apoptosis, and hence are tightly linked to cell fate. Several recent studies have used small molecules to affect circadian oscillations; however, their concomitant cellular effects were not assessed, and they have not been compared under similar experimental conditions. In this work, we use five molecules, grouped into direct versus indirect effectors of the circadian clock, to modulate periods in a human osteosarcoma cell line (U2OS) and determine their influences on cellular behaviors, including motility and colony formation. Luciferase reporters, whose expression was driven via Bmal1- or Per2-promoters, were used to facilitate the visualization and quantitative analysis of circadian oscillations. We show that all molecules increase or decrease the circadian periods of Bmal1 and Per2 in a dose-dependent manner, but period length does not correlate with the extent of cell migration or proliferation. Nonetheless, molecules that affected circadian oscillations to a greater degree resulted in substantial influence on cellular behaviors (ie, motility and colony formation), which may also be attributable to noncircadian targets. Furthermore, we find that the ability and extent to which the molecules are able to affect oscillations is independent of whether they are direct or indirect modulators. Because of the numerous connections and feedback between the circadian clock and other pathways, it is important to consider the effects of both in assessing these and other compounds.
Insights
Small molecules alter circadian rhythms in human cells, impacting cell behavior like motility and colony formation. The degree of circadian disruption, not just period length, significantly influences cellular outcomes, irrespective of the molecule
Area of Science:
- * Molecular Biology
- * Chronobiology
- * Cancer Cell Biology
Background:
- * Circadian rhythms regulate fundamental cellular processes including cell cycle, proliferation, and apoptosis, thereby influencing cell fate.
- * Previous studies modulated circadian oscillations with small molecules but lacked comprehensive assessment of cellular effects or standardized comparisons.
- * Understanding the interplay between circadian clock modulation and cellular behavior is crucial for therapeutic development.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To investigate the effects of five small molecules, categorized as direct or indirect circadian clock effectors, on circadian oscillations in U2OS cells.
- * To evaluate the influence of these modulations on cellular behaviors such as motility and colony formation.
- * To determine if the mechanism of action (direct vs. indirect) or the extent of circadian disruption correlates with observed cellular effects.
Main Methods:
- * Utilized human osteosarcoma (U2OS) cell line to model cellular responses.
- * Employed luciferase reporter systems driven by *Bmal1* and *Per2* promoters for quantitative analysis of circadian rhythmicity.
- * Assessed cell motility and colony formation assays to measure cellular behaviors.
- * Administered five distinct small molecules to modulate circadian periods in a dose-dependent manner.
Main Results:
- * All tested molecules modulated *Bmal1* and *Per2* circadian periods in a dose-dependent manner, either increasing or decreasing oscillation length.
- * No direct correlation was found between circadian period length and the extent of cell migration or proliferation.
- * Molecules causing greater disruption to circadian oscillations exhibited more significant impacts on cellular behaviors, potentially due to off-target effects.
- * The efficacy of molecules in altering circadian oscillations was independent of whether they acted as direct or indirect modulators.
Conclusions:
- * Small molecule-induced circadian rhythm disruption significantly influences cellular behaviors like motility and colony formation in U2OS cells.
- * The extent of circadian modulation, rather than solely the period length, is a key factor in determining cellular responses.
- * Non-circadian targets of these molecules likely contribute to the observed cellular effects.
- * Given the intricate feedback loops between the circadian clock and other cellular pathways, comprehensive assessment of both direct and indirect effects is essential when evaluating compounds.
More Related Videos
06:53Parallel Measurement of Circadian Clock Gene Expression and Hormone Secretion in Human Primary Cell Cultures
Published on: November 11, 2016
10:38Monitoring Cell-autonomous Circadian Clock Rhythms of Gene Expression Using Luciferase Bioluminescence Reporters
Published on: September 27, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Circadian Rhythms and Gene Regulation
Chronopharmacokinetics: Circadian Rhythms and Influence on Drug Response
The time of drug administration is an important factor to consider, as it can influence the toxic dose of a drug. For example, a study conducted by Prins et al. in 1997 examined the effects of the timing of...
Biological Clocks and Seasonal Responses
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Positive Regulator Molecules
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...