Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Motor Unit Stimulation01:20

Motor Unit Stimulation

3.4K
When the neuron of a motor unit fires an action potential, it triggers a series of events, leading to a twitch contraction in the muscle fibers. The process of excitation-contraction coupling is crucial in relaying the action potential to the muscle fibers.
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
3.4K
Muscle Coordination and Action01:24

Muscle Coordination and Action

2.9K
Muscle coordination is a complex and finely tuned process essential for smooth and purposeful movements like flexion, extension, adduction, abduction, and rotation. The human body orchestrates the actions of various muscles working in concert, each with a specific role. Four functional types describe how muscles work together: agonist, antagonist, synergist, and fixator.
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement....
2.9K
Self-Regulation01:25

Self-Regulation

160
Self-regulation, also known as self-control, encompasses a range of cognitive and behavioral processes that allow individuals to adjust their internal states and outward actions to align with socially acceptable norms and long-term goals. It plays a fundamental role in adaptive functioning, from resisting impulsive behaviors to persisting through challenging tasks. While its benefits are widely recognized, self-regulation is not limitless. Muraven and Baumeister's theory posits that...
160
Isotonic and Isometric Muscle Contractions01:22

Isotonic and Isometric Muscle Contractions

6.1K
Two primary types of muscle contractions are isotonic and isometric, each serving unique functions and involving distinct mechanisms. Both isotonic and isometric contractions are integral to the body's complex system of movement and stability. Isotonic exercises contribute significantly to functional strength and movement, while isometric contractions are crucial for maintaining posture and joint stability.
Isotonic contractions
Isotonic contractions occur when a muscle changes length while...
6.1K
Relaxation of Skeletal Muscles01:29

Relaxation of Skeletal Muscles

5.3K
The period of muscle contraction primarily influences the duration of stimulation at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), the presence of free calcium ions in the sarcoplasm, and the availability of energy or ATP to support contractions.
When an action potential reaches the axon terminal, it depolarizes the membrane and opens voltage-gated sodium channels. Sodium ions enter the cell, further depolarizing the presynaptic membrane. This depolarization causes voltage-gated calcium channels to open....
5.3K
Muscle Stimulation Frequency01:22

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

4.1K
The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gait Adaptation to Asymmetric Foot-Ground Compliance Applied by Robotic Footwear.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026
Same author

Foot-ground force quantifies impaired balance control mechanisms post-stroke.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Quiet standing: a simple motor task but a hard modeling challenge.

Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)·2026
Same author

Human Gait Entrainment to Periodic Neuro-Mechanical Perturbations: An Emerging Approach to Understanding Locomotion.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026
Same author

Testing sensorimotor timing across age and music experience in a real-world environment.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Design and Characterization of the AdjuSST: An Adjustable Surface Stiffness Treadmill.

IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics : a joint publication of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society and the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback
06:31

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Published on: June 19, 2016

8.1K

CONTROLLING PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS: HUMANS DO NOT MINIMIZE MUSCLE EFFORT.

Ryan Koeppen1, Dagmar Sternad2, Meghan E Huber1

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference
|June 5, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human motor control during tool use does not prioritize minimizing muscle effort. Instead, the brain likely reduces computational effort when interacting with physical constraints.

More Related Videos

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

5.0K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Grasping Abilities for Hemiplegic Patients with Flexible Robotic Limbs
03:55

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Grasping Abilities for Hemiplegic Patients with Flexible Robotic Limbs

Published on: October 27, 2023

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback
06:31

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Published on: June 19, 2016

8.1K
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

5.0K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Grasping Abilities for Hemiplegic Patients with Flexible Robotic Limbs
03:55

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Grasping Abilities for Hemiplegic Patients with Flexible Robotic Limbs

Published on: October 27, 2023

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomechanics
  • Human Motor Control

Background:

  • Tool use is a hallmark of human behavior, yet its motor control mechanisms are not fully understood.
  • Current theories suggest the central nervous system minimizes muscular effort during motor tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if minimizing muscle effort governs human control of physical interactions with constraints.
  • To test predictions derived from a simplified arm model assuming muscular effort minimization.

Main Methods:

  • Human subjects performed a task involving moving a robot handle around a virtual circular constraint at a very slow speed.
  • Predictions based on minimizing muscular effort included exerting workless radial forces, deactivating muscles when not contributing to work, and similar muscle activation for clockwise and counterclockwise motions.

Main Results:

  • Human experimental results did not support the muscular effort minimization model.
  • Subjects exerted workless forces but did not deactivate muscles as predicted.
  • Muscle activation patterns differed between clockwise and counterclockwise movements.

Conclusions:

  • Minimizing muscle effort is not a primary factor in controlling physical interactions with constraints.
  • The central nervous system may prioritize reducing computational effort over muscle effort in such tasks.