Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Cardiac telerehabilitation as an alternative to centre-based cardiac rehabilitation
R W M Brouwers1, H J van Exel2, J M C van Hal3
1Flow, Centre for Prevention, Telemedicine and Rehabilitation in Chronic Disease, Máxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. r.brouwers@mmc.nl.
Insights
Cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) offers a safe and effective alternative to traditional cardiac rehabilitation, improving accessibility and adherence for cardiovascular disease patients. This approach addresses low utilization rates and unmet secondary prevention goals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Digital Health
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves outcomes but suffers from low utilization and suboptimal secondary prevention.
- Barriers to CR access and adherence limit its effectiveness in many cardiovascular disease patients.
- Cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) emerges as a potential solution to overcome these limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and describe the core components of a new Dutch guideline addendum on multidisciplinary cardiac telerehabilitation.
- To highlight the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of CTR compared to traditional CR.
- To discuss the implications of CTR for clinical practice and future research directions.
Main Methods:
- Delivery of CR modules outside traditional settings using remote monitoring and communication.
- Integration of multidisciplinary care principles within the telerehabilitation framework.
- Guideline development based on current evidence and expert consensus.
Main Results:
- Multidisciplinary CTR is demonstrated to be a safe alternative to center-based CR.
- CTR is at least equally effective and cost-effective as traditional CR.
- CTR is recommended in a recent addendum to Dutch multidisciplinary CR guidelines.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac telerehabilitation is a viable and recommended strategy to enhance secondary prevention for cardiovascular disease patients.
- CTR effectively addresses barriers to CR utilization and improves sustainability of benefits.
- Implementation of CTR guidelines can optimize patient care and cardiovascular health outcomes.
Abstract:
Multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation (CR) reduces morbidity and mortality and increases quality of life in cardiac patients. However, CR utilisation rates are low, and targets for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease are not met in the majority of patients, indicating that secondary prevention programmes such as CR leave room for improvement. Cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) may resolve several barriers that impede CR utilisation and sustainability of its effects. In CTR, one or more modules of CR are delivered outside the environment of the hospital or CR centre, using monitoring devices and remote communication with patients. Multidisciplinary CTR is a safe and at least equally (cost-)effective alternative to centre-based CR, and is therefore recommended in a recent addendum to the Dutch multidisciplinary CR guidelines. In this article, we describe the background and core components of this addendum on CTR, and discuss its implications for clinical practice and future perspectives.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Restorative Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

