Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unraveling Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses Using the PlantScreen Robotic Platform
Published on: June 7, 2024
Image-Based Assessment of Drought Response in Grapevines
Nunzio Briglia1, Kevin Williams2, Dan Wu3
1Dipartimento delle Culture Europee e del Mediterraneo, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Matera, Italy.
Abstract:
Many plants can modify their leaf profile rapidly in response to environmental stress. Image-based data are increasingly used to retrieve reliable information on plant water status in a non-contact manner that has the potential to be scaled to high-throughput and repeated through time. This paper examined the variation of leaf angle as measured by both 3D images and goniometer in progressively drought stressed grapevine. Grapevines, grown in pots, were subjected to a 21-day period of drought stress receiving 100% (CTRL), 60% (IRR 60%) and 30% (IRR 30%) of maximum soil available water capacity. Leaf angle was (i) measured manually (goniometer) and (ii) computed by a 3D reconstruction method (multi-view stereo and structure from motion). Stomatal conductance, leaf water potential, fluorescence (F /F ), leaf area and 2D RGB data were simultaneously collected during drought imposition. Throughout the experiment, values of leaf water potential ranged from -0.4 (CTRL) to -1.1 MPa (IRR 30%) and it linearly influenced the leaf angle when measured manually (R 2 = 0.86) and with 3D image (R 2 = 0.73). Drought was negatively related to stomatal conductance and leaf area growth particularly in IRR 30% while photosynthetic parameters (i.e., F /F ) were not impaired by water restriction. A model for leaf area estimation based on the number of pixels of 2D RGB images developed at a different phenotyping robotized platform in a closely related experiment was successfully employed (R 2 = 0.78). At the end of the experiment, top view 2D RGB images showed a ∼50% reduction of greener fraction (GGF) in CTRL and IRR 60% vines compared to initial values, while GGF in IRR 30% increased by approximately 20%.
Related Concept Videos
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Light Acquisition

