Negotiating stairs with an inconsistent riser: Implications for stepping safety
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

The Ladder Rung Walking Task: A Scoring System and its Practical Application.
Published on: June 12, 2009
Natasha C Francksen1, Thijs M A Ackermans1, Denis Holzer2
1Research to Improve Stair Climbing Safety (RISCS), Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Abstract:
Stairs are associated with falls, especially when step dimensions are inconsistent. However, the mechanisms by which inconsistencies cause this higher risk are mostly theoretical. In this experimental study we quantified the effect of inconsistent rise heights on biomechanical measurements of stepping safety from younger (n = 26) and older adults (n = 33). In ascent, both groups decreased foot clearance (~9 mm) over the inconsistently higher step (F(1,56) = 48.4, p < 0.001). In descent, they reduced foot contact length on the higher step by 3% (F(1,56) = 9.1, p < 0.01). Reduced clearance may result in a toe-catch potentially leading to a trip, while reduced foot contact lengths increase the risk of overstepping which may also lead to a fall. These effects occurred because participants did not alter their foot trajectories, indicating they either did not detect or were not able to adjust to the inconsistent rise, increasing the likelihood of a fall. Consistent stair construction is vital, and existing inconsistencies should be identified and safety interventions developed.

