Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

511
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
511
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.6K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.6K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.6K
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification01:17

Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification

122
Self-verification is a fundamental psychological drive wherein individuals seek affirmation of their self-concept from others, striving for consistency between their internal self-view and external perceptions. This drive operates even when the self-concept is negative, influencing interpersonal behavior and feedback preferences in complex and often counterintuitive ways. Unlike the self-enhancement motive, which seeks positive evaluations, self-verification prioritizes coherence and...
122
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

13.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
13.7K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.8K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Employment and Wages of African American Male Ex-Offenders with Disabilities.

Journal of rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Chemotherapy-induced activation of caspase-1 and IL-1α release by cancer cells remotely skews myelopoiesis to drive pro tumorigenic systemic neutrophil-dominant inflammation.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Methotrexate oral or subcutaneous for rheumatoid arthritis (MOOSE): study protocol for a multi-centre randomised trial.

Trials·2025
Same author

Is your AI benchmark lying to you?

Nature·2025
Same author

Identifying Factors Associated With a Poor Outcome Following External Ventricular Drain Insertion for Spontaneous Intraparenchymal Haemorrhage.

ANZ journal of surgery·2025
Same author

Protect yourself - and your data - with these cybersecurity tips.

Nature·2025
Same journal

Feedback.

New scientist (1971)·2024
Same journal

Nanoscale DNA 'hand' grabs viruses.

New scientist (1971)·2023
Same journal

Does covid-19 affect pregnancies?

New scientist (1971)·2023
Same journal

Covid-19 vaccine tweak could better tackle today's variants.

New scientist (1971)·2023
Same journal

Covid-19's impact on the gut.

New scientist (1971)·2023
Same journal

Overcoming your inner goblin.

New scientist (1971)·2023
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing
06:55

Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing

Published on: May 8, 2021

6.1K

How accurate is self-testing?

Michael Brooks

    New Scientist (1971)
    |June 6, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Home self-testing for coronavirus in the UK is becoming more common. This report examines the reliability of self-administered swabs for accurate COVID-19 testing.

    More Related Videos

    Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
    05:51

    Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

    Published on: February 21, 2025

    1.1K
    A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
    08:33

    A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

    Published on: September 4, 2019

    7.4K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Dec 19, 2025

    Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing
    06:55

    Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing

    Published on: May 8, 2021

    6.1K
    Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
    05:51

    Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

    Published on: February 21, 2025

    1.1K
    A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
    08:33

    A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

    Published on: September 4, 2019

    7.4K

    Area of Science:

    • Virology
    • Public Health
    • Diagnostic Testing

    Background:

    • The United Kingdom has initiated a widespread program for self-testing to detect coronavirus.
    • The increasing reliance on at-home testing necessitates an evaluation of its accuracy and reliability.
    • Public health strategies are evolving to incorporate decentralized diagnostic approaches.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To assess the trustworthiness and accuracy of self-collected swabs for coronavirus testing.
    • To provide an evidence-based perspective on the validity of at-home COVID-19 testing kits.
    • To inform public health policy regarding the implementation of widespread self-testing programs.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of existing literature on self-administered diagnostic tests.
    • Analysis of data comparing results from home-based swabs versus professionally collected samples.
    • Evaluation of user-reported data and adherence to testing protocols.

    Main Results:

    • Preliminary findings suggest that while convenient, home-based coronavirus testing may present challenges in sample collection.
    • Accuracy can be variable depending on user technique and adherence to instructions.
    • Comparison with laboratory-confirmed results is crucial for validating at-home test outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Further research and clear guidelines are needed to ensure the reliability of self-testing for COVID-19.
    • Public education on proper swab collection techniques is essential for improving accuracy.
    • The role of self-testing in public health surveillance requires careful consideration of its limitations.