Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

07:14
Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities
Published on: May 24, 2022
5.0K
Tridimensional Evaluation of the Interfacial Gap in Deep Cervical Margin Restorations: A Micro-CT Study
Operative Dentistry
|June 6, 2020
Summary
Flowable resins offer better initial marginal seal in deep class II cavities but degrade more under chewing simulation compared to nanohybrid and bulk-fill composites, especially on dentin margins.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Restorative Dentistry
- Biomaterials Engineering
Background:
- Deep class II cavities present challenges for achieving optimal marginal seal.
- Margin elevation techniques are employed to manage deep cervical margins.
- The choice of restorative material significantly impacts the longevity of dental restorations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the tridimensional interfacial gap of class II cavities restored with different nanohybrid resin composites.
- To assess the impact of cyclic fatigue on the marginal seal of these restorations.
- To compare the performance of flowable resins, nanohybrid composites, and bulk-fill composites on enamel and dentin margins.
Main Methods:
- Standardized class II cavities were prepared on 48 premolars with margins above and below the cement-enamel junction (CEJ).
- Restorations were performed using a two-step self-etch adhesive and divided into six groups based on material and technique.
- Microcomputed Tomography (Micro-CT) was used to analyze interfacial gaps before and after 1,000,000 cycles of simulated chewing (50 N).
Main Results:
- Restoration technique and chewing simulation significantly affected interfacial gaps on dentin margins (p<0.001), but not on enamel.
- Flowable resins showed a smaller baseline gap on dentin but a larger gap after chewing simulation, particularly with a 2mm layer.
- Nanohybrid and bulk-fill composites demonstrated more stable marginal integrity on dentin after cyclic loading compared to flowable resins.
Conclusions:
- No significant differences in interfacial gap volume were observed on enamel margins across all tested materials.
- On dentin margins, while flowable resins initially provided a better seal, they were more susceptible to degradation under simulated chewing forces.
- Material selection optimizing marginal seal is crucial for managing deep class II cavities and enhancing clinical outcomes, especially concerning dentin margins.

