Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Investigating Aortic Valve Calcification via Isolation and Culture of T Lymphocytes using Feeder Cells from Irradiated Buffy Coat
Published on: February 4, 2021
TAVR for low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: Prognostic impact of aortic valve calcification
Sebastian Ludwig1, Alina Goßling1, Lara Waldschmidt1
1Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Insights
Aortic valve calcification density predicts better survival in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis patients undergoing TAVR. This finding aids in selecting patients likely to benefit from the procedure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Imaging
Background:
- Patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) have higher mortality post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) compared to high-gradient AS.
- Predictors of outcomes in this specific low-flow, low-gradient AS subset undergoing TAVR are not well-defined.
- The study investigates the prognostic significance of aortic valve calcification (AVC) in this patient population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prognostic impact of aortic valve calcification (AVC) quantification in patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS undergoing TAVR.
- To identify distinct outcome predictors within the low-flow, low-gradient AS patient subset.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 526 patients undergoing TAVR for severe low-flow, low-gradient AS (290 low EF-LG AS, 236 paradoxical low-flow-LG AS).
- Aortic valve calcification density (AVCdensity) quantified using contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography.
- Patients stratified by sex-specific AVCdensity tertiles; all-cause mortality assessed via Kaplan-Meier and multivariable analyses.
Main Results:
- Higher AVCdensity correlated with higher baseline transvalvular gradients and increased paravalvular leak (PVL) post-TAVR.
- High AVCdensity was associated with lower 1- and 3-year mortality in the low EF-LG AS group, but not in the paradoxical low-flow-LG AS group.
- Multivariable analysis confirmed AVCdensity as an independent predictor of better survival in low EF-LG AS patients (HR 0.73; P=.0011).
Conclusions:
- Aortic valve calcification quantification offers prognostic value beyond diagnostic utility in AS.
- AVCdensity aids in selecting low-flow, low-gradient AS patients who are more likely to experience a beneficial outcome after TAVR.
- The findings suggest AVCdensity is a key factor for improved survival prediction in specific low-flow, low-gradient AS subgroups.
Background:
Compared to high gradient aortic stenosis (AS), patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS have higher mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but distinct outcome predictors in this patient subset are yet to be determined. The present study investigated the prognostic impact of aortic valve calcification (AVC) in patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS undergoing TAVR.
Methods:
This retrospective single-center analysis includes all patients undergoing TAVR for severe low-flow, low-gradient AS (n = 526), ie, low EF low gradient AS (LEF-LG AS; n = 290) and paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient AS (PLF-LG AS; n = 236), in whom AVC was quantified from contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography images. AVCdensity was defined as calcium volume per annulus area. Patients were trichotomized according to sex-specific AVCdensity tertiles in both subgroups. All-cause mortality was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analyses and independent outcome predictors were determined by multivariable analyses.
Results:
In both subgroups, patients with high AVCdensity had higher mean transvalvular gradients at baseline and higher rates of PVL after TAVR. High AVCdensity was associated with lowest 1- and 3-year mortality after TAVR in the LEF-LG AS but not in the PLF-LG AS group. According to multivariable analysis AVCdensity was independently associated with better survival in LEF-LG AS patients (HR 0.73 [0.60-0.88], P = .0011), but not in those with PLF-LG AS (HR 0.91 [0.73-1.14], P = .42).
Conclusions:
Quantification of AVC may not only be of diagnostic but also of prognostic value, as it facilitates the selection of LEF-LG AS patients with higher probability of beneficial outcome after TAVR.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

