Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Subjective (dis)utility of effort: mentally and physically demanding tasks
Phillip L Ackerman1, Corey E Tatel2, Sibley F Lyndgaard2
1School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 654 Cherry Street, MC 0170, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0170, USA. plackerman@gatech.edu.
Abstract:
Effort as a concept, whether momentary, sustained, or as a function of different task conditions, is of critical importance to resource theories of attention, fatigue/boredom, workplace motivation, career selection, performance, job incentives, and other applied psychology concerns. Various models of motivation suggest that there is an inverted-U-shaped function describing the personal utility of effort, but there are expected to be individual differences in the optimal levels of effort that also are related to specific domain preferences. The current study assessed the disutility of effort for 125 different tasks/activities and also explored individual differences correlates of task preferences, in a sample of 77 undergraduate participants. The participants rated each activity in terms of the amount of compensation they would require to perform the task for a period of 4 h. They also completed paired comparisons for a subset of 24 items, followed by a set of preference judgments. Multidimensional scaling and preference scaling techniques were used to determine individual differences in task preference. Personality, motivation, and interest traits were shown to be substantially related to task preferences. Implications for understanding which individuals are oriented toward or away from tasks with different effort demands are discussed, along with considerations for the dynamics of attentional effort allocations during task performance.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Dissonance
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Self-Regulation
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Social Loafing
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects

