Extensions of the 2-in-1 adaptive design
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
Published on: October 5, 2020
Cong Chen1, Wen Li1, Qiqi Deng2
1Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA.
Abstract:
The 2-in-1 adaptive design [Chen et al. 2018] allows seamless expansion of an ongoing Phase 2 trial into a Phase 3 trial to expedite a drug development program. An intermediate endpoint can be used for the adaptive decision. Under a mild assumption that is expected to generally hold in practice, both the Phase 2 trial (in case of no expansion) and the Phase 3 trial (in case of expansion) can be tested at the full alpha level without inflating the overall Type I error of the study. Due to its flexibility and robustness, the design has quickly generated a lot of interest since its recent publication. We make three major extensions to the 2-in-1 design in this paper: 1) an increase of adaptive decisions from two to any number; 2) incorporation of the group sequential method for data monitoring; 3) expansion of the univariate design to multivariate. These extensions not only facilitate the application of 2-in-1 design in practice but also stimulate research interest in related statistical issues. Although we mainly use hypothetical trials in oncology and neuroscience for illustration, the application of the 2-in-1 design and its extensions is not limited to the two therapeutic areas.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Experimental Designs
Factorial Design
Group Design
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

