Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Cancer rates not explained by smoking: a county-level analysis.
Douglas J Myers1, Polly Hoppin2, Molly Jacobs2
1Department of Community and Environmental Health, College of Health Sciences, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725, USA. douglasmyers@boisestate.edu.
Complete smoking cessation could significantly reduce cancer rates by nearly 40%, especially for lung cancers. However, this alone won't eliminate cancer trends, highlighting the need to address environmental carcinogens alongside lifestyle changes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Epidemiology
- Environmental Health
Background:
- Long-standing debate on lifestyle vs. environmental factors in cancer etiology.
- Cigarette smoking is a primary cancer risk factor, but environmental/occupational carcinogen impact remains debated.
- Current cancer prevention often emphasizes smoking cessation and personal behaviors, with less focus on environmental chemical exposures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the potential impact of smoking cessation on cancer incidence rates.
- To quantify the effect of eliminating smoking on 12 smoking-related cancer types.
- To inform cancer prevention priorities by comparing smoking cessation impact with other risk factors.
Main Methods:
- Utilized SEER database cancer incidence data from 612 counties (2006-2016).
- Employed multilevel mixed-effects regression to link county-level smoking prevalence with cancer incidence.
- Simulated complete smoking cessation to estimate changes in county-level cancer rates.
Main Results:
- Simulated smoking cessation predicted a 39.8% decrease in 12 smoking-related cancer types (54.9% for airway cancers).
- While actual cancer rates declined, complete smoking elimination did not alter the incidence trend negatively.
- Unequal benefits predicted across counties; some may see less than 10% reduction.
Conclusions:
- Smoking prevention has driven significant cancer reductions, but complete cessation won't eliminate trends for all related cancers.
- Approximately 60% of cases for these 12 cancer types would remain even with zero smoking.
- Future cancer prevention must integrate lifestyle changes with addressing environmental and occupational carcinogens.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Causality in Epidemiology
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

