Author response to: Evidence supporting the sunk cost fallacy of advocating for transanal total mesorectal excision

Related Experiment Videos

S E van Oostendorp¹, C Sietses², R Hompes³

¹Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

The British Journal of Surgery

|June 8, 2020

Abstract

No abstract available in PubMed .

Related Concept Videos

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Using a composite end-point and WIN-ratio analysis to evaluate perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: further insights from the BIOPEX trials.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2025

Oncological outcomes of planned and unplanned low Hartmann's procedure and restorative low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Techniques in coloproctology·2025

Hospital costs of different treatment strategies for anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision: a multicentre cost analysis.

Techniques in coloproctology·2025

Defining Standard Data Reporting in Pelvic Exenterations for Non-Rectal Cancers: A Systematic Review of Current Data Reporting.

Cancers·2025

Treatment with checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable non-metastatic mismatch repair deficient intestinal cancer; a case series.

BJC reports·2025

Risk factors and risk prediction modelling for pelvic sepsis and anastomotic leak following robotic total mesorectal excision with primary anastomosis for rectal cancer.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2025

See all related articles