Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Preferences for emergency medical service transport after childhood injury: An emergency department-based
Rob Thinnes1, Morgan B Swanson2, Kristel Wetjen3
1Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Insights
Guardians consider injury severity, personal experiences, and EMS availability when deciding on pre-hospital emergency medical services (EMS) for children. Many are unaware of EMS capabilities, and cost is a perceived risk.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Trauma Care
- Emergency Medical Services (EMS)
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Pre-hospital emergency medical services (EMS) transport offers benefits for pediatric injury.
- Many pediatric trauma patients do not utilize EMS for transport.
- Understanding guardian decision-making for pediatric EMS use is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify factors influencing guardians' decisions regarding pre-hospital emergency medical services (EMS) transport for injured children.
- To explore the perspectives of guardians whose children presented to a trauma center via EMS or non-EMS means.
Main Methods:
- Multi-methods study involving pediatric trauma patients (≤14 years) and their guardians.
- Collected demographic and injury data; conducted semi-structured interviews.
- Qualitative coding and thematic analysis of guardian decision factors.
Main Results:
- Guardian assessment of injury severity did not correlate with objective measures (ISS).
- Key decision themes included injury nature, guardian experience, EMS access, perceived risks/benefits, and collaborative decision-making.
- Guardians often lacked knowledge of local EMS capabilities, and cost was a perceived barrier.
Conclusions:
- Guardian transport decisions are multifactorial, influenced by injury, personal, and system-level factors.
- Disseminating information on pre-hospital care and EMS capabilities to guardians is needed.
- Further research should explore the link between EMS utilization and pediatric trauma outcomes.
Background:
Pre-hospital emergency medical services (EMS) transport can be associated with benefits following pediatric injury. However, many pediatric trauma patients do not use EMS. The objective of this study was to elucidate guardians' decision factors for pre-hospital transport for children after injury.
Methods:
This is a multi-methods study of pediatric trauma patients (≤14 years) and their guardians presenting to the ED of a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center via both EMS and non-EMS modalities. Demographic information and injury characteristics were collected. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and qualitative codes were identified and assigned into themes.
Results:
(Quantitative): Of the 29 child-guardian pairs, five participants initially presented by EMS, 18 were admitted, and the majority (66%) sustained mild injuries. Guardians' assessment of their child's injury severity did not correlate with Injury Severity Score (ISS). Neither EMS status (did or did not use EMS to transport to first hospital) nor rurality status of participants' place of residence were associated with disparate management in any of the three scenarios.
(Qualitative):
Five themes emerged, which informed guardians' transport decisions: Factors Related to the Nature of the Patient's Injury, Guardian Attributes and Prior Experiences, Access and Availability of EMS, Perceived Risks and Benefits of EMS and Hospital, and Collaborative Decision-Making. Injury characteristics and contextual factors, like perceived EMS response times and advice from family or medical providers, were considered in choices about EMS utilization and hospital selection. Despite the view that EMS response times were important in determining what to do following injury, both EMS and non-EMS users were largely unfamiliar with the capabilities of EMS in their area. Finally, guardians described cost to be a theoretical risk of EMS use, and a few cited this as a factor contributing to their decision-making.
Conclusions:
Guardians used a variety of considerations to make transport decisions, including the five themes identified above. Future studies could explore modalities to disseminate information about pre-hospital decision-making for guardians and determine the relationship between EMS utilization and patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...

