Urologic oncology surgery during COVID-19: a rapid review of current triage guidance documents
Brian M Shinder1, Hiren V Patel1, Joshua Sterling1
1Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Abstract:
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic placed urologic surgeons, and especially urologic oncologists, in an unprecedented situation. Providers and healthcare systems were forced to rapidly create triage schemas in order to preserve resources and reduce potential viral transmission while continuing to provide care for patients. We reviewed United States and international triage proposals from professional societies, peer-reviewed publications, and publicly available institutional guidelines to identify common themes and critical differences. To date, there are varying levels of agreement on the optimal triaging of urologic oncology cases. As the need to preserve resources and prevent viral transmission grows, prioritizing only high priority surgical cases is paramount. A similar approach to prioritization will also be needed as nonemergent cases are allowed to proceed in the coming weeks. While these decisions will often be made on a case-by-case basis, more nuanced surgeon-driven consensus guidelines are needed for the near future.
More Related Videos
05:19A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
Published on: November 7, 2025
13:37A Mouse Tumor Model of Surgical Stress to Explore the Mechanisms of Postoperative Immunosuppression and Evaluate Novel Perioperative Immunotherapies
Published on: March 12, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Urinary Tract Calculi V: Nursing Management
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Infection IV: Nursing Management
