Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
Published on: September 5, 2019
Aren't Prosody and Syntax Marking Bias in Questions?
Anja Arnhold1,2, Bettina Braun, Maribel Romero2
1University of Alberta, Canada.
English and German speakers use different strategies to disambiguate polar questions. English relies on intonation, while German uses morphosyntax to indicate which proposition is being questioned.
Area of Science:
- Linguistics
- Psycholinguistics
- Semantics
Background:
- English polar questions with high negation exhibit ambiguity, serving to confirm the speaker's belief (p) or the addressee's disbelief (¬p).
- This ambiguity is potentially resolved through prosodic cues, a phenomenon explored in prior linguistic research.
- German, unlike English, possesses morphosyntactic markers to distinguish between these two types of polar questions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the hypothesized prosodic disambiguation of English polar questions with high negation.
- To test the hypothesis that German lacks this prosodic disambiguation due to its morphosyntactic marking system.
- To compare the strategies employed by English and German speakers in conveying the intended proposition of polar questions.
Main Methods:
- A production study involving 24 native speakers of Western Canadian English and 24 native speakers of German.
- Analysis of 764 English and 767 German utterances to identify prosodic and morphosyntactic disambiguation strategies.
- Controlled manipulation of speaker certainty regarding the proposition being questioned.
Main Results:
- English speakers, when faced with a belief conflict (speaker believes p, addressee implies ¬p), preferred high negation questions and used intonation to signal the checked proposition.
- German speakers predominantly used morphosyntax: high negation questions for their own belief (p) and low negation questions for the addressee's belief (¬p).
- Prosodic patterns in German were largely dictated by the chosen morphosyntactic form, and speaker certainty did not significantly influence the marking strategy.
Conclusions:
- English employs prosody (intonation) to disambiguate the intended proposition in polar questions with high negation.
- German utilizes morphosyntactic variations (high vs. low negation) to differentiate between speaker- and addressee-oriented propositions.
- The findings support the hypothesis that prosodic disambiguation is absent in German, replaced by distinct morphosyntactic strategies.
More Related Videos
09:27Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
09:09Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Correspondence Bias
Confirmation Biases
Surveys
Language and Cognition
Components of Language