Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Improving the efficiency of clinical trials by standardizing processes for Investigator Initiated Trials
Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam1,2, Milind A Phadnis1,2, Ron Krebill1
1Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Mail Stop 1026, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Abstract:
Early phase clinical trials are the first step in testing new medications and therapeutics developed by clinical and biomedical investigators. These trials aim to find a safe dose of a newly targeted drug (phase I) or find out more about the side effects and early signals of treatment efficacy (phase II). In a research institute, many biomedical investigators in oncology are encouraged to initiate such trials early in their careers as part of developing their research portfolio. These investigator-initiated trials (IITs) are funded internally by the University of Kansas Cancer Center or partially funded by pharmaceutical companies. As financial, administrative, and practical considerations play an essential role in the successful completion of IITs, it is imperative to efficiently allocate resources to plan, design, and execute these studies within the allotted time. This manuscript describes monitoring tools and processes to improve the efficiency, cost-effectivness, and reliability of IITs. The contributions of this team to processes such as: participant recruitment, feasibility analysis, clinical trial design, accrual monitoring, data management, interim analysis support, and final analysis and reporting are described in detail. This manuscript elucidates how, through the aid of technology and dedicated personnel support, the efficiency of IIT-related processes can be improved. Early results of these initiatives look promising, and the Biostatistics and Informatics team intends to continue fostering innovative methodologies to enhance cancer research by improving the efficiency of IITs.
Insights
Investigator-initiated clinical trials (IITs) are crucial for developing new cancer treatments. This study details methods and tools to enhance the efficiency and reliability of early-phase oncology trials, improving cancer research outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Research
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Early phase clinical trials (Phase I and II) are essential for testing new cancer therapeutics.
- Investigator-initiated trials (IITs) are vital for career development in oncology research.
- Efficient resource allocation is critical for the successful completion of IITs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe monitoring tools and processes for improving IIT efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and reliability.
- To detail the contributions of a dedicated team to key IIT processes.
- To elucidate how technology and personnel support can enhance IITs.
Main Methods:
- Description of monitoring tools and processes for IITs.
- Detailed account of team contributions to participant recruitment, feasibility analysis, trial design, accrual monitoring, data management, and analysis.
- Elucidation of technology and personnel support strategies.
Main Results:
- Implementation of monitoring tools and processes shows promising early results.
- Improved efficiency in IIT-related processes has been observed.
- Enhanced reliability and cost-effectiveness of IITs are being achieved.
Conclusions:
- Dedicated personnel and technological support significantly improve IIT efficiency.
- Optimizing IIT processes is key to advancing cancer research.
- Continued innovation in methodologies will further enhance the efficiency of investigator-initiated cancer trials.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Blinding

