Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics
Published on: April 12, 2019
Systematic Parametrization of Divalent Metal Ions for the OPC3, OPC, TIP3P-FB, and TIP4P-FB Water Models
Zhen Li1, Lin Frank Song1, Pengfei Li2
1Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Abstract:
Divalent metal ions play important roles in biological and materials systems. Molecular dynamics simulation is an efficient tool to investigate these systems at the microscopic level. Recently, four new water models (OPC3, OPC, TIP3P-FB, and TIP4P-FB) have been developed and better represent the physical properties of water than previous models. Metal ion parameters are dependent on the water model employed, making it necessary to develop metal ion parameters for select new water models. In the present work, we performed parameter scanning for the 12-6 Lennard-Jones nonbonded model of divalent metal ions in conjunction with the four new water models as well as four previous water models (TIP3P, SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP4P-Ew). We found that these new three-point and four-point water models provide comparable or significantly improved performance for the simulation of divalent metal ions when compared to previous water models in the same category. Among all eight water models, the OPC3 water model yields the best performance for the simulation of divalent metal ions in the aqueous phase when using the 12-6 model. On the basis of the scanning results, we independently parametrized the 12-6 model for 24 divalent metal ions with each of the four new water models. As noted previously, the 12-6 model still fails to simultaneously reproduce the experimental hydration free energy (HFE) and ion-oxygen distance (IOD) values even with these new water models. To solve this problem, we parametrized the 12-6-4 model for the 16 divalent metal ions for which we have both experimental HFE and IOD values for each of the four new water models. The final parameters are able to reproduce both the experimental HFE and IOD values accurately. To validate the transferability of our parameters, we carried out benchmark calculations to predict the energies and geometries of ion-water clusters as well as the ion diffusivity coefficient of Mg2+. By comparison to quantum chemical calculations and experimental data, these results show that our parameters are well designed and have excellent transferability. The metal ion parameters for the 12-6 and 12-6-4 models reported herein can be employed in simulations of various biological and materials systems when using the OPC3, OPC, TIP3P-FB, or TIP4P-FB water model.
More Related Videos
05:37Rapid in-silico Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Reaction Generation using 3T-VASP Multi-Scale Energy Minimization
Published on: August 22, 2025
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Complexometric Titration: Ligands
Valence Bond Theory
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Extraction: Advanced Methods
EDTA: Chemistry and Properties
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...